Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Individual, ecological, and anthropogenic influences on activity budgets of long-finned pilot whales

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

DOI

Open Access permissions

Open

Abstract

Time allocation to different activities and habitats enables individuals to modulate their perceived risks and access to resources, and can reveal important trade-offs between fitness-enhancing activities (e.g., feeding vs. social behavior). Species with long reproductive cycles and high parental investment, such as marine mammals, rely on such behavioral plasticity to cope with rapid environmental change, including anthropogenic stressors. We quantified activity budgets of free-ranging long-finned pilot whales in order to assess individual time trade-offs between foraging and other behaviors in different individual and ecological contexts, and during experimental sound exposures. The experiments included 1-2 and 6-7 kHz naval sonar exposures (a potential anthropogenic stressor), playback of killer whale (a potential predator/competitor) vocalizations, and negative controls. We combined multiple time series data from digital acoustic recording tags (DTAG) as well as group-level social behavior data from visual observations of tagged whales at the surface. The data were classified into near-surface behaviors and dive types (using a hidden Markov model for dive transitions) and aggregated into time budgets. On average, individuals (N=19) spent most of their time (69%) resting and transiting near surface, 21% in shallow dives (depth <40m), and only 10% of their time in deep foraging dives, of which 65% reached a depth 10m from the sea bottom. Individuals in the largest of three body size classes or accompanied by calves tended to spend more time foraging than others. Simultaneous tagging of pairs of individuals showed that up to 50% of the activity budget was synchronized between conspecifics with decreased synchrony during foraging periods. Individuals spent less time foraging when forming larger non-vocal aggregations of individuals in late afternoons, and more time foraging when in the mid-range of water depths (300-400m) available in the study area (50-700m). Individuals reduced foraging time by 83% (29-96%) during their first exposure to sonar, but not during killer whale sound playbacks. A relative increase in foraging during repeat sonar exposures indicated habituation or change in response tactic. We discuss the possible adaptive value of these trade-offs in time allocation to reduce individual conflict while maintaining benefits of group living.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere02044
Number of pages26
JournalEcosphere
Volume8
Issue number12
Early online date27 Dec 2017
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2017

    Research areas

  • Anthropogenic noise, Activity synchrony, Benthic habitat, Deep diving mammal, DTAG, Ethogram, Globicephala melas, Hidden Markov model, Naval sonar

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Marine mammals and sonar: dose-response studies, the risk-disturbance hypothesis and the role of exposure context

    Harris, C. M., Thomas, L., Falcone, E., Hildebrand, J., Houser, D., Kvadsheim, P., Lam, F-P. A., Miller, P., Moretti, D. J., Read, A., Slabbekoorn, H., Southall, B. L., Tyack, P. L., Wartzok, D. & Janik, V. M. Jan 2018 In : Journal of Applied Ecology. 55, 1, p. 396-404

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewReview article

  2. The challenges of analyzing behavioral response study data: an overview of the MOCHA (Multi-study OCean acoustics Human effects Analysis) project

    Harris, C. M., Thomas, L., Sadykova, D., De Ruiter, S. L., Tyack, P. L., Southall, B. L., Read, A. J. & Miller, P. 2016 Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life II. Popper, A. N. & Hawkins, A. (eds.). Springer Science and Business Media, p. 399-407 9 p. (Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; vol. 875)

    Research output: ResearchConference contribution

  3. Dose response severity functions for acoustic disturbance in cetaceans using recurrent event survival analysis

    Harris, C. M., Sadykova, D., De Ruiter, S. L., Tyack, P. L., Miller, P., Kvadsheim, P., Lam, F-P. & Thomas, L. 20 Nov 2015 In : Ecosphere. 6, 11, 14 p., 236

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

  4. Severity of expert-identified behavioural responses of humpback whale, minke whale, and northern bottlenose whale to naval sonar

    Sivle, L. D., Kvadsheim, P. H., Cure, C., Isojunno, S., Wensveen, P. J., Lam, F-P. A., Visser, F., Kleivane, L., Tyack, P. L., Harris, C. M. & Miller, P. 19 Nov 2015 In : Aquatic Mammals. 41, 4, p. 469-502 34 p.

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

Related by journal

  1. Mate limitation in sea lice infesting wild salmon hosts: the influence of parasite sex ratio and aggregation

    Cox, R., Groner, M., Todd, C. D., Gettinby, G., Patanasatienkul, P. & Revie, C. Dec 2017 In : Ecosphere. 8, 12, 19 p., e02040

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

  2. Responses of bottlenose dolphins and harbor porpoises to impact and vibration piling noise during harbor construction

    Graham, I., Pirotta, E., Merchant, N., Farcas, A., Barton, T., Cheney, B., Hastie, G. D. & Thompson, P. May 2017 In : Ecosphere. 8, 5, 16 p., e01793

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

  3. A new approach to estimate fecundity rate from inter-birth intervals

    Arso Civil, M., Cheney, B., Quick, N. J., Thompson, P. M. & Hammond, P. S. Apr 2017 In : Ecosphere. 8, 4, 10 p., e01796

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

  4. Circumpolar habitat use in the southern elephant seal: implications for foraging success and population trajectories

    Hindell, M. A., McMahon, C. R., Bester, M. N., Boehme, L., Costa, D., Fedak, M., Guinet, C., Herraiz-Borreguero, L., Harcourt, R. G., Huckstadt, L., Kovacs, K. M., Lydersen, C., McInytre, T., Muelbert, M., Roquet, F., Williams, G. & Charrassin, J-B. 26 May 2016 In : Ecosphere. 7, 5, p. 1-27 27 p., e01213

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

ID: 251763383