Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Ladies, gentlemen, and scientific publication at the Royal Society, 1945-1990

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

DOI

Open Access permissions

Open

Abstract

This paper extends the scholarship on gender and scientific authorship by exploring women’s involvement in editorial decision-making. Prior to 1945, women scientists could submit their work to the journals of the Royal Society, but they were excluded from all editorial and evaluation roles: such gate-keeping roles were reserved for Fellows of the Society. We draw upon the Society’s archive to examine the experiences of female authors, referees, and communicators in the period after women were admitted to the Fellowship. We investigate the involvement of women in both anonymous roles (e.g. as referees), and in publicly-visible positions of editorial responsibility (e.g. as communicators, and committee chairs). We reveal that women were better represented in both types of roles in the 1950s than in the 1970s and 1980s. These findings are pertinent to current debates about bias in the peer-review system, and the gendering of academic reward and recognition structures.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-40
JournalOpen Library of Humanities
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Jun 2018

    Research areas

  • Royal Society, Gender, Peer review, Editorial practices, Higher education, History of Science

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Untangling academic publishing: a history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research

    Fyfe, A., Coate, K., Curry, S., Lawson, S., Moxham, N. & Rostvik, C. M., 25 May 2017, St Andrews: University of St Andrews. 26 p.

    Research output: Book/ReportOther report

  2. Introducing: the Menstruation Research Network

    Rostvik, C. M., Bildhauer, B. M. E., Hughes, B. & Owen, L., 3 Jun 2019, The Polyphony.

    Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationLetter

  3. It's not all about the money: To help learned societies adjust to Plan S, treat them as more than just publishers

    Fyfe, A., 1 May 2019, Research Fortnight, p. 15 1 p.

    Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

  4. Opening up access to research: a film review of Paywall: the Business of Scholarship, directed and produced by Jason Schmitt, 2018

    Fyfe, A., 18 Apr 2019, Endeavour, In press.

    Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationBook/Film/Article review

Related by journal

  1. Incomplete peace and social stagnation: shortcomings of the Good Friday Agreement

    Hall, A. L., 10 Aug 2018, In : Open Library of Humanities. 4, 2, 31 p., 7.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Mining the material archive: balancing sensate experience and sense-making in digitized print collections

    Forlini, S., Hinrichs, U. & Brosz, J., 23 Nov 2018, In : Open Library of Humanities. 4, 2, p. 1-36 36 p., 35.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Opening the black box of scholarly communication funding: a public data infrastructure for financial flows in academic publishing

    Lawson, S., Gray, J. & Mauri, M., 11 Apr 2016, In : Open Library of Humanities. 2, 1, p. 1-35 35 p., e10.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 252029046