Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Language origins viewed in spontaneous and interactive vocal rates of human and bonobo infants

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

D. Kimbrough Oller, Ulrike Griebel, Suneeti Nathani Iyer, Yuna Jhang, Anne S. Warlaumont, Rick Dale, Josep Call

School/Research organisations

Abstract

From the first months of life, human infants produce “protophones,” speech-like, non-cry sounds, presumed absent, or only minimally present in other apes. But there have been no direct quantitative comparisons to support this presumption. In addition, by 2 months, human infants show sustained face-to-face interaction using protophones, a pattern thought also absent or very limited in other apes, but again, without quantitative comparison. Such comparison should provide evidence relevant to determining foundations of language, since substantially flexible vocalization, the inclination to explore vocalization, and the ability to interact socially by means of vocalization are foundations for language. Here we quantitatively compare data on vocalization rates in three captive bonobo (Pan paniscus) mother–infant pairs with various sources of data from our laboratories on human infant vocalization. Both humans and bonobos produced distress sounds (cries/screams) and laughter. The bonobo infants also produced sounds that were neither screams nor laughs and that showed acoustic similarities to the human protophones. These protophone-like sounds confirm that bonobo infants share with humans the capacity to produce vocalizations that appear foundational for language. Still, there were dramatic differences between the species in both quantity and function of the protophone and protophone-like sounds. The bonobo protophone-like sounds were far less frequent than the human protophones, and the human protophones were far less likely to be interpreted as complaints and more likely as vocal play. Moreover, we found extensive vocal interaction between human infants and mothers, but no vocal interaction in the bonobo mother–infant pairs—while bonobo mothers were physically responsive to their infants, we observed no case of a bonobo mother vocalization directed to her infant. Our cross-species comparison focuses on low- and moderate-arousal circumstances because we reason the roots of language entail vocalization not triggered by excitement, for example, during fighting or intense play. Language appears to be founded in flexible vocalization, used to regulate comfortable social interaction, to share variable affective states at various levels of arousal, and to explore vocalization itself.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number729
Number of pages18
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Apr 2019

    Research areas

  • Human evolution, Origin of language, Bonobo, Comparative psychology, Infant directed speech, Evolution of language, Parent-infant interaction, Babbling

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Revisiting the possibility of reciprocal help in non-human primates

    Schweinfurth, M. K. & Call, J., Sep 2019, In : Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 104, p. 73-86 14 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

  2. Innovative problem solving in great apes: the role of visual feedback in the floating peanut task

    Ebel, S. J., Schmelz, M., Herrmann, E. & Call, J., Sep 2019, In : Animal Cognition. 22, 5, p. 791-805 15 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Disentangling great apes’ decoy-effect bias in a food choice task

    Sánchez-Amaro, A., Altinok, N., Heintz, C. & Call, J., 1 Aug 2019, In : Animal Behavior and Cognition. 6, 3, p. 213-222 10 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Bargaining in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): the effect of cost, amount of gift, reciprocity and communication

    Bueno-Guerra, N., Voelter, C. J., de las Heras, Á., Colell, M. & Call, J., 27 Jun 2019, In : Journal of Comparative Psychology. Online First

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Frontiers in Psychology (Journal)

    Joanne Elizabeth Cecil (Editor)
    May 20132017

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

Related by journal

  1. The influence of body composition effects on male facial masculinity and attractiveness

    Lei, X., Holzleitner, I. & Perrett, D. I., 4 Jan 2019, In : Frontiers in Psychology. 9, 2658.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Stroboscopic vision when interacting with multiple moving objects: perturbation is not the same as elimination

    Bennett, S. J., Hayes, S. J. & Uji, M., 25 Jul 2018, In : Frontiers in Psychology. 9, 13 p., 1290.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. The whistleblower’s dilemma in young children: when loyalty trumps other moral concerns

    Misch, A., Over, H. & Carpenter, M., 1 Mar 2018, In : Frontiers in Psychology. 9, 9 p., 250.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. ‘Talkin’ ‘bout my generation’: using a mixed-methods approach to explore changes in adolescent well-being across several European countries

    Cosma, A. P., Belic, J., Blecha, O., Fenski, F., Lo, M. Y., Murar, F., Petrovic, D. & Stella, M. T., 18 May 2017, In : Frontiers in Psychology. 8, 9 p., 758.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 258433070