Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Lost revenues in low income countries

Research output: Working paper

Abstract

This research estimates how much revenue six low income countries – of which five are in sub Saharan Africa - are losing unnecessarily from various potential revenue streams that could be used to fund public services.

In recent years, increased attention has been paid to government revenues lost to tax evasion and to tax incentives given to corporations. However, few attempts have been made to estimate losses for a larger number of potential revenue streams. This task is critical given the massive under-funding of public services, and the extent of need, in Low Income Countries.

Developing countries can lose revenue in a variety of ways. Here we estimate how much is being lost from the following sources:

Corporate tax avoidance by multinational companies
Providing tax incentives (for example, reductions or exemptions from the payment of corporate taxes) which constitute government ‘tax expenditure’
Not collecting taxes from a proportion of business activity in the informal sector
Corruption in the national budget
Debt interest payments to international creditors.

The responsibility for these revenue losses lies partly with foreign and partly with domestic actors. Multinational companies are depriving governments of revenues by failing to pay fair taxes. Many companies also receive tax incentives, which reduces their tax payments to governments still further. Governments could themselves be doing much more to stop the leakage of revenues. They could do much more to tax parts of the currently informal sector, which often comprise businesses operating under the radar of the tax authorities but which should pay their fair share of taxes. They must also do more to prevent corruption in the budget, which means that a proportion of public money allocated to support public services is often simply lost in the system somewhere. Both foreign and domestic actors need to ensure that low income countries are also paying back a fair proportion of the debt interest they owe, but no more than that.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages1-27
Number of pages27
Publication statusIn preparation - 10 Aug 2017

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Addressing inequities in child health and development: towards social justice

    Spencer, N., Raman, S., O'Hare, B. A-M. & Tamburlini, G., 1 Aug 2019, In : BMJ Paediatrics Open. 3, 1, 6 p., e000503.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

  2. Survival rights for children: what are the national and global barriers?

    O'Hare, B. A-M., Mfutso Bengo, E. M., Devakumar, D. & Mfutso Bengo, J., 20 Dec 2018, In : African Human Rights Law Journal. 18, 2, p. 508-526

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Tax and the right to health

    O'Hare, B. A-M., 4 Dec 2018, In : Health and Human Rights Journal. 20, 2, p. 57-63 7 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Active global citizenship: ethical living to promote human rights

    O'Hare, B., 6 Nov 2018, Harvard Health and Human Rights Journal.

    Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

ID: 250642309

Top