Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Lung cancer CT screening: psychological responses in the presence and absence of pulmonary nodules

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Marcia E Clark, Laura E Bedford, Ben Young, John FR Robertson, Roshan das Nair, Kavita Vedhara, Roberta Littleford, Francis M Sullivan, Frances S Mair, Stuart Schembri, Petra Rauchhaus, Denise Kendrick

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the psychological response (thoughts, perceptions and affect) to a diagnosis of pulmonary nodules following a novel antibody blood test and computed tomography (CT) scans within a UK population.

Materials and methods: This study was nested within a randomised controlled trial of a blood test (Early CDT®-Lung test), followed by a chest x-ray and serial CT-scanning of those with a positive blood test for early detection of lung cancer (ECLS Study). Trial participants with a positive Early CDT®-Lung test were invited to participate (n = 338) and those agreeing completed questionnaires assessing psychological outcomes at 1, 3 and 6 months following trial recruitment. Responses of individuals with pulmonary nodules on their first CT scan were compared to those without (classified as normal CT) at 3 and 6 months follow-up using random effects regression models to account for multiple observations per participant, with loge transformation of data where modelling assumptions were not met.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the nodule and normal CT groups in affect, lung cancer worry, health anxiety, illness perceptions, lung cancer risk perception or intrusive thoughts at 3 or 6 months post-recruitment. The nodule group had statistically significantly fewer avoidance symptoms compared to the normal CT group at 3 months (impact of events scale avoidance (IES-A) difference between means -1.99, 95%CI -4.18, 0.21) than at 6 months (IES-A difference between means 0.88, 95%CI -1.32, 3.08; p-value for change over time = 0.003) with similar findings using loge transformed data.

Conclusion: A diagnosis of pulmonary nodules following an Early CDT®-Lung test and CT scan did not appear to result in adverse psychological responses compared to those with a normal CT scan.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
JournalLung Cancer
VolumeIn press
Early online date3 Aug 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 Aug 2018

    Research areas

  • Pulmonary nodules, Lung cancer screening, Psychological impact

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Do statins have an effect on depressive symptoms? A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Yatham, M. S., Yatham, K. S., Ravindran, A. V. & Sullivan, F., 1 Oct 2019, In : Journal of Affective Disorders. 257, p. 55-63 9 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Unconditional and conditional monetary incentives to increase response to mailed questionnaires: a randomized controlled study within a trial (SWAT)

    Young, B., Bedford, L., das Nair, R., Gallant, S., Littleford, R., Robertson, J. F. R., Schembri, S., Sullivan, F. M., Vedhara, K., Kendrick, D. & ECLS study team, 22 Jul 2019, In : Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. Early View

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Effects of antiplatelet therapy after stroke due to intracerebral haemorrhage (RESTART): a randomised, open-label trial

    RESTART Collaboration & Sullivan, F., 29 Jun 2019, In : Lancet. 393, 10191, p. 2613-2623 11 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. The impact of treatment adherence for patients with diabetes and hypertension on cardiovascular disease risk: a protocol for a retrospective cohort study, 2008-2018

    Su, M., Haldane, V., Upshur, R., Sullivan, F., Garda, F. L. A., Greiver, M. & Wei, X., 31 May 2019, In : JMIR Research Protocols. 8, 5, 11 p., e13571.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. Factors associated with recruitment to randomised controlled trials in general practice: protocol for a systematic review

    Moffat, K. R., Cannon, P., Shi, W. & Sullivan, F., 10 May 2019, In : Trials. 20, 4 p., 66.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 255208090

Top