Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Male Norway rats cooperate according to direct but not generalized reciprocity rules

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Author(s)

Manon K. Schweinfurth, Jonathan Aeschbacher, Massimiliano Santi, Michael Taborsky

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Reciprocal cooperation may evolve if the costs of help are reliably compensated for by delayed returns provided in future interactions. The associated probabilities and cost–benefit ratios may vary systematically between the sexes, which often display different dispersal strategies and interaction patterns. Whereas female Norway rats, Rattus norvegicus, are known to apply direct and generalized decision rules of reciprocal cooperation, the rules according to which males reciprocate favours are less well understood. Therefore, we investigated the cooperation propensity of male wild-type Norway rats. Male test rats experienced cooperating partners that provided food to them, or defecting partners that refused to provide help. Afterwards, test rats could donate food to previously experienced or unknown partners, resembling direct and generalized reciprocity paradigms, respectively. Male rats cooperated according to direct reciprocity, suggesting that this decision rule is similarly important for both sexes. However, whereas females additionally help according to generalized reciprocity, males did not apply this rule. These results suggest a sex difference in reciprocal decision rules, highlighting the potential importance of different interaction patterns and cost–benefit ratios between the sexes.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)93-101
JournalAnimal Behaviour
Volume152
Early online date27 Apr 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2019

    Research areas

  • Altruism, Cooperation, Generosity, Reciprocity, Sex differences

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Anybody watching? How others can affect helpful actions

    Schweinfurth, M. K., 3 Sep 2020, In: Learning and Behavior. First Online, 2 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. The social life of Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus)

    Schweinfurth, M. K., 9 Apr 2020, In: eLife. 9, 26 p., e54020.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

  3. Rats play tit-for-tat instead of integrating social experience over multiple interactions

    Schweinfurth, M. K. & Taborsky, M., 15 Jan 2020, In: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 287, 1918, 20192423.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Reciprocity: different behavioural strategies, cognitive mechanisms and psychological processes

    Schweinfurth, M. K. & Call, J., Dec 2019, In: Learning and Behavior. 47, p. 284–301 18 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. Animal Behaviour (Journal)

    Manon Karin Schweinfurth (Member of editorial board)

    1 Jan 2021 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

  2. Animal Behaviour (Journal)

    Susan Denise Healy (Editor)

    1 Jan 201831 Dec 2018

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

  3. Animal Behaviour (Journal)

    Will Cresswell (Reviewer)

    15 Sep 2017

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesPeer review of manuscripts

  4. Animal Behaviour (Journal)

    Michael Munro Webster (Editor)

    1 Jan 201731 Dec 2019

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

  5. Animal Behaviour (Journal)

    Susan Denise Healy (Editor)

    1 Jan 201731 Dec 2017

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

Related by journal

  1. Are cognitive abilities under selection by female choice? A comment on Chen et al. (2019)

    Camacho-Alpízar, A., Griffin, A. S. & Guillette, L. M., Jul 2020, In: Animal Behaviour. 165, p. e1-e3

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Cognitive styles: speed–accuracy trade-offs underlie individual differences in archerfish

    Jones, N. A. R., Webster, M., Newport, C., Templeton, C. N., Schuster, S. & Rendell, L., Feb 2020, In: Animal Behaviour. 160, p. 1-14 14 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. The reliability of individual vocal signature varies across the bonobo's graded repertoire

    Keenan, S., Mathevon, N., Stevens, J. M. G., Nicolè, F., Zuberbühler, K., Guéry, J. P. & Levréro, F., Nov 2020, In: Animal Behaviour. 169, p. 9-21 13 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Evolutionary roads to syntax

    Zuberbuhler, K., May 2019, In: Animal Behaviour. 151, p. 259-265

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

ID: 258819251

Top