Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Managing the growth of peer review at the Royal Society journals, 1865-1965

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Author(s)

Aileen Fyfe, Flaminio Squazzoni, Didier Torny, Pierpaolo Dondio

School/Research organisations

Abstract

This article examines the evolution of peer review and the modern editorial processes of scholarly journals by analyzing a novel dataset derived from the Royal Society’s archives and covering 1865 to 1965, i.e., the historical period in which refereeing (not yet known as peer review) became firmly established. Our analysis reveals how the Royal Society’s editorial processes coped with both an increasing reliance on refereeing and a growth in submissions, while maintaining collective responsibility and minimizing research waste. By engaging more of its fellows in editorial activity, the society was able to establish an equilibrium of number of submissions per reviewer that was relatively stable over time. Nevertheless, our analysis shows that the distribution of editorial work was significantly uneven. Our findings reveal interesting parallels with current concerns about the scale and distribution of peer-review work and suggest the strategic importance of the management of the editorial process to achieve a creative mix of community commitment and professional responsibility that is essential in contemporary journals.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)405-429
Number of pages25
JournalScience, Technology, and Human Values
Volume45
Issue number3
Early online date15 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2020

    Research areas

  • Peer review, Scholarly journals, Editorial work, Royal Society, Responsibility

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Self-help for learned journals: scientific societies and the commerce of publishing in the 1950s

    Fyfe, A., 18 Mar 2021, In: History of Science. Online First, 25 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. The Royal Society and the noncommercial circulation of knowledge

    Fyfe, A., 21 Oct 2020, Reassembling Scholarly Communications: Histories, Infrastructures, and Global Politics of Open Access. Eve, M. P. & Gray, J. (eds.). MIT Press, p. 147-160

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

  3. The production, circulation, consumption and ownership of scientific knowledge: historical perspectives

    Fyfe, A., 6 Sep 2020, Glasgow: CREATe (UK Copyright and Creative Economy Centre, University of Glasgow), (CREATe Working Papers).

    Research output: Working paper

  4. Special Issue:Editorship and the Editing of Scientific Journals, 1750–1950

    Fyfe, A. (ed.) & Gielas, A. M. (ed.), Feb 2020, In: Centaurus. 62, 1

    Research output: Contribution to journalSpecial issuepeer-review

  5. Introduction: Editorship and the editing of scientific journals, 1750-1950

    Fyfe, A. & Gielas, A. M., 2020, In: Centaurus. 62, 1, p. 5-20 16 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

ID: 259114733

Top