Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Mapping philanthropic foundations’ characteristics: towards an international integrative framework of foundation types

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

As philanthropic foundations take on increasingly prominent socio-political roles, the need for stronger conceptualizations of foundations as an organizational form is articulated widely across academic, policy and practice contexts. Building on institutional research’s tradition of categorizing, classifying and typologizing organizational forms, our paper critically explores the different ways in which foundations have been cast and differentiated in international academic and practice literatures. Examining and integrating these, we propose an integrative framework of foundation types. Incorporating 13 categories – three contextual, five organizational and five strategic ones – the framework allows for clarifying distinctions and identifying commonalities between different foundation forms, offering a basis for developing more reflective and differentiated research and practice knowledge.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)893-917
JournalNonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
Volume47
Issue number5
Early online date16 May 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2018

    Research areas

  • Foundations, Typology, Classification, Theory of foundation, Organizational forms

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. The European philanthropy manifesto: ‘clearly needed and a very good thing’?

    Harrow, J. & Jung, T., 30 Sep 2019, In : Voluntary Sector Review. Fast track, 12 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Providing foundations: philanthropy, global policy and administration

    Jung, T. & Harrow, J., 17 Jan 2019, The Oxford handbook of global policy and transnational administration. Stone, D. & Moloney, K. (eds.). Oxford University Press, 19 p. (Oxford Handbooks).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

  3. Foundations in the U.K. organizations and nations in a state of flux

    Jung, T., 8 May 2018, In : American Behavioral Scientist. Online First, 23 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. The Nonprofit sectors' rich relations? Foundations and their grantmaking activities

    Jung, T., 2018, (Accepted/In press) The Routledge Companion to Nonprofit Management. Toepler, S. & Anheier, H. (eds.). Routledge

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

  5. Debate: collapsing collegiality in universities’ fundraising?

    Harrow, J. & Jung, T., Sep 2017, In : Public Money & Management. 37, 6, p. 434

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Related by journal

  1. When funders do direct advocacy: an exploration of the United Kingdom's Corston Independent Funders' Coalition

    Jung, T., Kaufmann, J. & Harrow, J., Feb 2014, In : Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 43, 1, p. 36-56

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. New Technologies, Embedded Values, and Strategic Change: Evidence from the U.K. Voluntary Sector

    Burt, E. & Taylor, JA., Mar 2003, In : Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 32, 1, p. 115-127 13 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 245528199

Top