Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Mid-sized groups perform best in a collective decision task in sticklebacks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Numerous studies have reported functional improvements in collective behaviour with increasing group size, however, the possibility that such improvements may saturate or even decline as group size continues to grow have seldom been tested experimentally. Here, we tested the ability of solitary three-spined sticklebacks and those in groups, ranging from 2 to 29 fish, to leave an unfavourable patch of habitat. Our results replicate the findings of previous studies at low group sizes, with the fish initially showing a reduction in their latency to leave the unfavourable habitat as group size increased. As group size continued to increase, however, latency to leave the habitat increased, so that the functional relationship between group size and latency to depart was U-shaped. Our results suggest an optimum group size in this context of between 12 and 20 fish. Underlying this group-level trend was a similar U-shaped relationship between group size and the first fish to leave the habitat, suggesting that at larger group sizes, social conformity to the behaviour of the majority can stifle the ability of fish to innovate-in this case, to induce a collective movement from the unfavourable habitat.

Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number20190335
JournalBiology Letters
Volume15
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Oct 2019

    Research areas

  • Grouping, Schooling, Shoaling, Sociality, Swarm intelligence

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. How STRANGE are your study animals?

    Webster, M. M. & Rutz, C., 18 Jun 2020, In: Nature. 582, p. 337-340 4 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Social recognition and social attraction in group-living fishes

    Ward, A. J. W., Kent, M. I. A. & Webster, M. M., 2 Feb 2020, In: Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 8, 16 p., 15.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

  3. Cognitive styles: speed–accuracy trade-offs underlie individual differences in archerfish

    Jones, N. A. R., Webster, M., Newport, C., Templeton, C. N., Schuster, S. & Rendell, L., Feb 2020, In: Animal Behaviour. 160, p. 1-14 14 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Teaching laboratory for large cohorts of undergraduates: private and social information in fish

    Borcherding, J., Webster, M. M. & Heubel, K., 2 Dec 2019, In: Ecology and Evolution. Early View, 7 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. Biology Letters (Journal)

    Graeme Douglas Ruxton (Editor)

    2012 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

  2. Biology Letters (Journal)

    Karen Anne Spencer (Member of editorial board)

    1 Apr 2011

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

  3. Biology Letters (Journal)

    David Michael Shuker (Member of editorial board)

    2011

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

  4. Biology Letters (Journal)

    Josep Call (Member of editorial board)

    20072013

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

  5. Biology Letters (Journal)

    Richard William Byrne (Member of editorial board)

    20072012

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

Related by journal

  1. Can behaviour impede evolution? Persistence of singing effort after morphological song loss in crickets

    Rayner, J. G., Schneider, W. & Bailey, N. W., Jun 2020, In: Biology Letters. 16, 6, 5 p., 20190931.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Chimpanzee lip-smacks confirm primate continuity for speech-rhythm evolution

    Pereira, A. S., Kavanagh, E., Hobaiter, C., Slocombe, K. E. & R. Lameira, A., 27 May 2020, In: Biology Letters. 16, 5, 20200232.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Does kin discrimination promote cooperation?

    Faria, G. & Gardner, A., Mar 2020, In: Biology Letters. 16, 3, 4 p., 20190742.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Examining the mechanisms underlying the acquisition of animal tool behaviour

    Bandini, E., Motes-Rodrigo, A., Steele, M. P., Rutz, C. & Tennie, C., 24 Jun 2020, In: Biology Letters. 16, 6, 6 p., 20200122.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  5. Partitioning colony size variation into growth and partial mortality

    Madin, J. S., Baird, A. H., Baskett, M. L., Connolly, S. R. & Dornelas, M. A., 22 Jan 2020, In: Biology Letters. 16, 1, 2019.0727.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

ID: 261744844

Top