Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Model selection with overdispersed distance sampling data

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

1. Distance sampling (DS) is a widely used framework for estimating animal abundance. DS models assume that observations of distances to animals are independent. Non‐independent observations introduce overdispersion, causing model selection criteria such as AIC or AICc to favour overly complex models, with adverse effects on accuracy and precision.

2. We describe, and evaluate via simulation and with real data, estimators of an overdispersion factor (ĉ), and associated adjusted model selection criteria (QAIC) for use with overdispersed DS data. In other contexts, a single value of ĉ is calculated from the “global” model, that is the most highly parameterised model in the candidate set, and used to calculate QAIC for all models in the set; the resulting QAIC values, and associated ΔQAIC values and QAIC weights, are comparable across the entire set. Candidate models of the DS detection function include models with different general forms (e.g. half‐normal, hazard rate, uniform), so it may not be possible to identify a single global model. We therefore propose a
two‐step model selection procedure by which QAIC is used to select among models with the same general form, and then a goodness‐of‐fit statistic is used to select among models with different forms. A drawback of thi approach is that QAIC values are not comparable across all models in the candidate set.

3. Relative to AIC, QAIC and the two‐step model selection procedure avoided overfitting and improved the accuracy and precision of densities estimated from simulated data. When applied to six real datasets, adjusted criteria and procedures selected either the same model as AIC or a model that yielded a more accurate density estimate in five cases, and a model that yielded a less accurate estimate in one case.

4. Many DS surveys yield overdispersed data, including cue counting surveys of songbirds and cetaceans, surveys of social species including primates, and camera‐trapping surveys. Methods that adjust for overdispersion during the model selection stage of DS analyses therefore address a conspicuous gap in the DS analytical framework as applied to species of conservation concern.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)38-47
JournalMethods in Ecology and Evolution
Volume10
Issue number1
Early online date20 Sep 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2019

    Research areas

  • Animal abundance, Camera trapping, Cue counting, Distance sampling, Model selection, Overdispersion, QAIC

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Fire and biodiversity in the Anthropocene

    Kelly, L. T., Giljohann, K. M., Duane, A., Aquilué, N., Archibald, S., Batllori, E., Bennett, A. F., Buckland, S. T., Canelles, Q., Clarke, M. F., Fortin, M-J., Hermoso, V., Herrando, S., Keane, R. E., Lake, F. K., McCarthy, M. A., Morán-Ordóñez, A., Parr, C. L., Pausas, J. G., Penman, T. D. & 7 others, Regos, A., Rumpff, L., Santos, J. L., Smith, A. L., Syphard, A. D., Tingley, M. W. & Brotons, L., 20 Nov 2020, In: Science. 370, 6519, 11 p., eabb0355.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

  2. Using density surface models to estimate spatio-temporal changes in population densities and trend

    Camp, R. J., Miller, D. L., Thomas, L., Buckland, S. T. & Kendall, S. J., Jul 2020, In: Ecography. 43, 7, p. 1079-1089 11 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Incorporating animal movement into distance sampling

    Glennie, R., Buckland, S. T., Langrock, R., Gerrodette, T., Ballance, L., Chivers, S. & Scott, M., 8 Jun 2020, In: Journal of the American Statistical Association. Latest Articles, p. 1-9 9 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Spider monkeys, the misunderstood assumptions of distance sampling and the pitfalls of poor field design

    de Andrade, A. C., Marques, T. A. & Buckland, S. T., 1 Dec 2019, In: Biodiversity and Conservation. 28, 14, p. 4119-4121 3 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

  5. Assessing factors associated with changes in the numbers of birds visiting gardens in winter: are predators partly to blame?

    Swallow, B. T., Buckland, S. T., King, R. & Toms, M. P., Nov 2019, In: Ecology and Evolution. 9, 21, p. 12182-12192 11 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. Methods in Ecology and Evolution (Journal)

    Michael Blair Morrissey (Member of editorial board)

    1 Jan 20171 Jan 2020

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

  2. Methods in Ecology and Evolution (Journal)

    Theoni Photopoulou (Editor)

    2017 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

  3. Methods in Ecology and Evolution (Journal)

    Oscar Eduardo Gaggiotti (Member of editorial board)

    1 Sep 2014 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

Related by journal

  1. A spatial capture-recapture model to estimate call rate and population density from passive acoustic surveys

    Stevenson, B. C., van Dam-Bates, P., Young, C. K. Y. & Measey, J., Mar 2021, In: Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 12, 3, p. 432-442

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. A standardisation framework for bio-logging data to advance ecological research and conservation

    Sequeira, A. M. M., O’Toole, M., Keates, T. R., McDonnell, L. H., Braun, C. D., Hoenner, X., Jaine, F. R. A., Jonsen, I. D., Newman, P., Pye, J., Bograd, S. J., Hays, G. C., Hazen, E. L., Holland, M., Tsontos, V., Blight, C., Cagnacci, F., Davidson, S. C., Dettki, H., Duarte, C. M. & 22 others, Dunn, D. C., Eguíluz, V. M., Fedak, M., Gleiss, A. C., Hammerschlag, N., Hindell, M. A., Holland, K., Janekovic, I., McKinzie, M. K., Muelbert, M. M. C., Pattiaratchi, C., Rutz, C., Sims, D. W., Simmons, S. E., Townsend, B., Whoriskey, F., Woodward, B., Costa, D. P., Heupel, M. R., McMahon, C. R., Harcourt, R. & Weise, M., 1 Apr 2021, In: Methods in Ecology and Evolution. Early View

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Fast, flexible alternatives to regular grid designs for spatial capture-recapture

    Durbach, I. N., Borchers, D. L., Sutherland, C. & Sharma, K., Feb 2021, In: Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 12, 2, p. 298-310

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. A field and video-annotation guide for baited remote underwater stereo-video surveys of demersal fish assemblages

    Langlois, T., Goetze, J., Bond, T., Monk, J., Abesamis, R. A., Asher, J., Barrett, N., Bernard, A. T. F., Bouchet, P. J., Birt, M. J., Cappo, M., Currey-Randall, L. M., Driessen, D., Fairclough, D. V., Fullwood, L. A. F., Gibbons, B. A., Harasti, D., Heupel, M. R., Hicks, J., Holmes, T. H. & 21 others, Huveneers, C., Ierodiaconou, D., Jordan, A., Knott, N. A., Lindfield, S., Malcolm, H. A., McLean, D., Meekan, M., Miller, D., Mitchell, P. J., Newman, S. J., Radford, B., Rolim, F. A., Saunders, B. J., Stowar, M., Smith, A. N. H., Travers, M. J., Wakefield, C. B., Whitmarsh, S. K., Williams, J. & Harvey, E. S., Nov 2020, In: Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 11, 11, p. 1401-1409

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  5. Listening and watching: do camera traps or acoustic sensors more efficiently detect wild chimpanzees in an open habitat?

    Crunchant, A-S., Borchers, D., Kühl, H. & Piel, A., Apr 2020, In: Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 11, 4, p. 542-552

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

ID: 255735220

Top