Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Monitoring cetaceans in European waters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

P G H Evans, P S Hammond

School/Research organisations

Abstract

1. Monitoring spatial and temporal patterns in cetacean abundance involves a variety of approaches depending upon the target species and the resources available. As a first step, the collection of incidental sightings or strandings information aids the construction of a species list and a rough measure of status and seasonal variation in abundance. These often make use of networks of volunteer observers although the wide variation in abilities and experience means that special attention must be paid to training and to data quality control. More robust monitoring of numbers requires quantification of effort and some correction for factors that influence detectability, such as sea state.

2. The presence of cetaceans may be recorded visually, or indirectly by acoustics. Each has advantages and disadvantages, and their applicability may vary between species. The use of fixed stations tends to allow sustained monitoring at relatively low cost but coverage is limited to the immediate vicinity. For more extensive coverage, mobile platforms are necessary. Platforms of opportunity such as ferries, whale-watching boats, etc. are often used to survey areas at low cost. These may allow repeat observations to be made over time, but with no control over where the vessel goes, it is typically not possible to sample wide areas, thus limiting abundance estimation.

3. Line transect surveys using dedicated platforms allow representative coverage of areas from which abundance estimates can be made (either using indices or absolute measures derived from density estimation). Assumptions relating to detectability and responsiveness need to be addressed and various methods (such as two-platform surveys) have been developed to accommodate these.

4. For some cetacean species, mark-recapture methods can be applied using photo-identification of recognizable individuals. Again, a number of assumptions are made, particularly relating to recognizability, representativeness of sampling and capture probabilities. Capturing, on film, as many animals in the population as possible helps to reduce the problem of heterogeneity of capture probabilities. Mark-recapture methods require at least two sampling occasions. If multiple sampling is employed, either open or closed population models can be used.

5. Measuring population change represents a particular challenge for mobile animals such as cetaceans. Changes in ranging patterns may have a large impact on abundance estimates unless very large areas are adequately covered. Power analysis is a useful method to indicate the ability of the data to detect a trend of a given magnitude. Increasingly, spatial modelling using GLMs and GAMs is being used to provide a better understanding of the biotic and hydrographic factors influencing cetacean distribution.

Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)131-156
Number of pages26
JournalMammal Review
Volume34
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2004

    Research areas

  • acoustics, distribution, dolphins, line transect surveys, marine mammals, photo-identification, population change, whales, HUMPBACK WHALES, HARBOR PORPOISE, POWER ANALYSIS, ABUNDANCE, POPULATION, TRENDS, DOLPHINS, SEA

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Changing distribution of the east coast of Scotland bottlenose dolphin population and the challenges of area-based management

    Arso Civil, M., Quick, N. J., Cheney, B., Pirotta, E., Thompson, P. M. & Hammond, P. S., 6 Sep 2019, In : Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 29, S1, p. 178-196 19 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Fine-scale habitat partitioning of Chilean and Peale’s dolphins and their overlap with aquaculture

    Heinrich, S., Genov, T., Fuentes Riquelme, M. & Hammond, P. S., 6 Sep 2019, In : Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 29, S1, p. 212-226

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Site fidelity and movement patterns of short-finned pilot whales within the Canary Islands: evidence for resident and transient populations

    Servidio, A., Pérez-Gil, E., Pérez-Gil, M., Cañadas, A., Hammond, P. S. & Martín, V., 6 Sep 2019, In : Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 29, S1, p. 227-241

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. The effect of a multi-target protocol on cetacean detection and abundance estimation in aerial surveys

    Lambert, C., Authier, M., Dorémus, G., Gilles, A., Hammond, P., Laran, S., Ricart, A., Ridoux, V., Scheidat, M., Spitz, J. & Van Canneyt, O., 4 Sep 2019, In : Royal Society Open Science. 6, 9, 17 p., 190296.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. From the southern right whale hunting decline to the humpback whaling expansion: a review of whale catch records in the tropical western South Atlantic Ocean

    de Morais, I. O. B., Danilewicz, D., Zerbini, A. N., Edmundson, W., Hart, I. B. & Bortolotto, G. A., Jan 2017, In : Mammal Review. 47, 1, p. 11-23

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Integrating multiple data sources to assess the distribution and abundance of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in Scottish waters.

    Cheney, B., Thompson, P. M., Ingram, S. N., Hammond, P. S., Stevick, P. T., Durban, J. W., Culloch, R. M., Elwen, S. H., Mandleberg, L., Janik, V. M., Quick, N. J., Islas Villanueva, V., Robinson, K. P., Costa, M., Eisfeld, S. M., Walters, A., Phillips, C., Weir, C. R., Evans, P. G. H., Anderwald, P. & 3 others, Reid, R. J., Reid, J. B. & Wilson, B., 2013, In : Mammal Review. 43, p. 71-88

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Getting beneath the surface of marine mammal - fisheries competition

    Matthiopoulos, J., Smout, S. C., Winship, A., Thompson, D., Boyd, I. L. & Harwood, J., Apr 2008, In : Mammal Review. 38, 2-3, p. 167-188 22 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Responses of cetaceans to anthropogenic noise

    Nowacek, D. P., Thorne, L. H., Johnston, D. W. & Tyack, P. L., Apr 2007, In : Mammal Review. 37, 2, p. 81-115 35 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

ID: 734147

Top