Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Monitoring the biodiversity of regions: key principles and possible pitfalls

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Through the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) 2010 and 2020 biodiversity targets, nations committed to reducing the rate of loss of biodiversity. This requires calculating the biodiversity trends in nations, whereas previously, most academic research on quantifying biodiversity concerned communities within relatively small sites. We consider design and analysis issues that CBD targets raise and explore the potential pitfalls for managers of monitoring schemes when statistical principles yield to practical constraints. We list five main criteria that well-designed monitoring programmes should meet: representative sampling locations, sufficient sample size, sufficient detections of target species, a representative sample of species, and a sound temporal sampling scheme. We examine the implications of biodiversity assessments that fail to meet these criteria and suggest ways to alleviate these implications through analytical approaches. We discuss the remarkable potential for wide-scale biodiversity monitoring offered by technological advances and by the rise of citizen science.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)23-34
Number of pages12
JournalBiological Conservation
Volume214
Early online date4 Aug 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2017

    Research areas

  • Animal abundance estimation, Biased sample, Biodiversity trends, Convention for Biological Diversity targets, Geometric mean, Representative sample

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Fire and biodiversity in the Anthropocene

    Kelly, L. T., Giljohann, K. M., Duane, A., Aquilué, N., Archibald, S., Batllori, E., Bennett, A. F., Buckland, S. T., Canelles, Q., Clarke, M. F., Fortin, M-J., Hermoso, V., Herrando, S., Keane, R. E., Lake, F. K., McCarthy, M. A., Morán-Ordóñez, A., Parr, C. L., Pausas, J. G., Penman, T. D. & 7 others, Regos, A., Rumpff, L., Santos, J. L., Smith, A. L., Syphard, A. D., Tingley, M. W. & Brotons, L., 20 Nov 2020, In: Science. 370, 6519, 11 p., eabb0355.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

  2. Using density surface models to estimate spatio-temporal changes in population densities and trend

    Camp, R. J., Miller, D. L., Thomas, L., Buckland, S. T. & Kendall, S. J., Jul 2020, In: Ecography. 43, 7, p. 1079-1089 11 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Incorporating animal movement into distance sampling

    Glennie, R., Buckland, S. T., Langrock, R., Gerrodette, T., Ballance, L., Chivers, S. & Scott, M., 8 Jun 2020, In: Journal of the American Statistical Association. Latest Articles, p. 1-9 9 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Spider monkeys, the misunderstood assumptions of distance sampling and the pitfalls of poor field design

    de Andrade, A. C., Marques, T. A. & Buckland, S. T., 1 Dec 2019, In: Biodiversity and Conservation. 28, 14, p. 4119-4121 3 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

  5. Assessing factors associated with changes in the numbers of birds visiting gardens in winter: are predators partly to blame?

    Swallow, B. T., Buckland, S. T., King, R. & Toms, M. P., Nov 2019, In: Ecology and Evolution. 9, 21, p. 12182-12192 11 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. Raptor research during the COVID-19 pandemic provides invaluable opportunities for conservation biology

    Sumasgutner, P., Buij, R., McClure, C. J. W., Shaw, P., Dykstra, C. R., Kumar, N. & Rutz, C., 28 Apr 2021, In: Biological Conservation. 109149.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Inter-aviary distance and visual access influence conservation breeding outcomes in a territorial, endangered bird

    Flanagan, A. M., Rutz, C., Farabaugh, S., Greggor, A. L., Masuda, B. & Swaisgood, R. R., 4 Feb 2020, In: Biological Conservation. 242, 108429.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Factors affecting feelings of justice in biodiversity conflicts: towards fairer jaguar management in Calakmul, Mexico

    Lecuyer, L., Calmé, S., Blanchet, F. G., Schmook, B. & White, R. M., Sep 2019, In: Biological Conservation. 237, p. 133-144

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Implications of farmland expansion for species abundance, richness and mean body mass in African raptor communities

    Shaw, P., Kibuule, M., Nalwanga, D., Kaphu, G., Opige, M. & Pomeroy, D., Jul 2019, In: Biological Conservation. 235, p. 164-177 14 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  5. Uses, cultural significance, and management of peatlands in the Peruvian Amazon: implications for conservation

    Schulz, C., Martín Brañas, M., Núñez Pérez, C., Del Aguila Villacorta, M., Laurie, N., Lawson, I. T. & Roucoux, K. H., Jul 2019, In: Biological Conservation. 235, p. 189-198 10 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

ID: 250594810

Top