Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Multisensory decisions: the test of a race model, its logic, and power

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Thomas Otto, Pascal Mamassian

School/Research organisations

Abstract

The use of separate multisensory signals is often beneficial. A prominent example is the speed-up of responses to two redundant signals relative to the components, which is known as the redundant signals effect (RSE). A convenient explanation for the effect is statistical facilitation, which is inherent in the basic architecture of race models (Raab, 1962). However, this class of models has been largely rejected in multisensory research, which we think results from an ambiguity in definitions and misinterpretations of the influential race model test (Miller, 1982). To resolve these issues, we here discuss four main items. First, we clarify definitions and ask how successful models of perceptual decision making can be extended from uni- to multisensory decisions. Second, we review the race model test and emphasize elements leading to confusion with its interpretation. Third, we introduce a new approach to study the RSE. As a major change of direction, our working hypothesis is that the basic race model architecture is correct even if the race model test seems to suggest otherwise. Based on this approach, we argue that understanding the variability of responses is the key to understand the RSE. Finally, we highlight the critical role of model testability to advance research on multisensory decisions. Despite being largely rejected, it should be recognized that race models, as part of a broader class of parallel decision models, demonstrate, in fact, a convincing explanatory power in a range of experimental paradigms. To improve research consistency in the future, we conclude with a short checklist for RSE studies.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1–24
JournalMultisensory Research
Volume30
Issue number1
Early online date6 Oct 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2017

    Research areas

  • Logic gates, Perceptual decision making, Race model, Multisensory processing, Probability summation, Redundant signals effect, Reaction time, Modality switching

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. RSE-box: an analysis and modelling package to study response times to multiple signals

    Otto, T. U., 11 Sep 2019, In : The Quantitative Methods for Psychology. 15, 2, p. 112-133 22 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. A comparative analysis of response times shows that multisensory benefits and interactions are not equivalent

    Innes, B. R. & Otto, T. U., 27 Feb 2019, In : Scientific Reports. 9, 10 p., 2921.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. RSE-box, Version 1.0

    Otto, T., 2018

    Research output: Non-textual formSoftware

  4. Principles of Multisensory Behavior

    Otto, T., Dassy, B. & Mamassian, P., 24 Apr 2013, In : The Journal of Neuroscience. 33, 17, p. 7463-7474 12 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. Noise and Correlations in Parallel Perceptual Decision Making

    Otto, T. & Mamassian, P., 7 Aug 2012, In : Current Biology. 22, 15, p. 1391-1396 6 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 245865048

Top