Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Natural perspective: mapping visual space with art and science

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

DOI

Open Access permissions

Open

Author(s)

Alistair Burleigh, Robert Pepperell, Nicole Ruta

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Following its discovery in fifteenth-century Italy, linear perspective has often been hailed as the most accurate method of projecting three-dimensional visual space onto a two-dimensional picture plane. However, when we survey the history of European art it is evident that few artists fully complied with its mathematical rules, despite many of them being rigorously trained in its procedures. In this paper, we will consider how artists have actually depicted visual space, and present evidence that images created according to a “natural” perspective (NP) used by artists are judged as better representations of visual space than those created using standard linear (LP) and curvilinear fisheye (FP) projective geometries. In this study, we built a real three-dimensional scene and produced photographs of the scene in three different perspectives (NP, LP and FP). An online experiment in which we asked people to rank the perspectives in order of preference showed a clear preference for NP compared to the FP and LP. In a second experiment, participants were asked to view the real scene and rate each perspective on a range of psychological variables. Results showed that NP was the most preferred and the most effective in depicting the physical space naturally. We discuss the implications of these results and the advantages and limitations of our approach for studying the global metric and geometrical structure of visual space.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number21
JournalVision
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 May 2018

    Research areas

  • Art, Visual space, Perspective, Natural perspective, Geometrical perspective, Peripheral visual field

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Preference for paintings is also affected by curvature

    Ruta, N., Vañó, J., Pepperell, R., Corradi, G. B., Chuquichambi, E. G., Rey, C. & Munar, E., 13 May 2021, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Online First

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. A comparison between preference judgments of curvature and sharpness in architectural façades

    Ruta, N., Mastandrea, S., Penacchio, O., Lamaddalena, S. & Bove, G., 28 Dec 2018, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Architectural Science Review. Latest Articles, 11 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. The perceived size and shape of objects in peripheral vision

    Baldwin, J., Burleigh, A., Pepperell, R. & Ruta, N., 17 Aug 2016, In: i-Perception. 7, 4, p. 1-23 23 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Comparing angular and curved shapes in terms of implicit associations and approach/avoidance responses

    Palumbo, L., Ruta, N. & Bertamini, M., 13 Oct 2015, In: PLoS ONE.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  5. The Pleasantness of Visual Symmetry: Always, Never or Sometimes

    Pecchinenda, A., Bertamini, M., Ruta, N. & Makin, A. D. J., 21 Mar 2014, In: PLoS ONE.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. Chromatic induction in migraine

    Cerda-Company, X., Penacchio, O. & Otazu, X., 6 Aug 2021, In: Vision. 5, 3, 14 p., 37.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Three-dimensional motion perception: comparing speed and speed change discrimination for looming stimuli

    Lee, A. R. I., Ales, J. M. & Harris, J., 6 Jul 2020, In: Vision. 4, 3, 17 p., 33.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. The influence of typography on algorithms that predict the speed and comfort of reading

    Wilkins, A., Smith, K. & Penacchio, O., 12 Mar 2020, In: Vision. 4, 1, 18.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Investigating human visual sensitivity to binocular motion-in-depth for anti- and de-correlated random-dot stimuli

    Giesel, M., Wade, A., Bloj, M. & Harris, J., 1 Nov 2018, In: Vision. 2, 4, 41.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. Vision (Journal)

    Julie Harris (Member of editorial board)

    1 Jul 20181 Jul 2022

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

ID: 270971131

Top