Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

On the microeconomic foundations of linear demand for differentiated products

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Rabah Amir, Philip Erickson, Jim Jin

School/Research organisations

Abstract

This paper provides a thorough exploration of the microeconomic foundations for the multi-variate linear demand function for differentiated products, which is widely used in industrial organization. The setting is the standard representative consumer with a quasi-linear utility function. A key finding is that strict concavity of the quadratic utility function is critical for the demand system to be well defined. Otherwise, the true demand function may be quite complex: Multi-valued, non-linear and income-dependent. We uncover failures of duality relationships between substitute products and complementary products, as well as the incompatibility between high levels of complementarity and concavity. The two-good case emerges as a special case with strong but non-robust properties. A key implication is that all conclusions derived in applied economic models via the use of linear demand that does not satisfy the Law of Demand ought to be regarded with some suspicion.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)641-665
JournalJournal of Economic Theory
Volume169
Early online date27 Mar 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2017

    Research areas

  • Linear demand, Gross substitutes, Gross complements, Edgeworth complements, Representative consumer, Law of Demand

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Higher tax for top earners

    FitzRoy, F. R. & Jin, J. Y., Oct 2017, In : Journal of Economics. 122, 2, p. 121-136 16 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Free trade versus autarky under asymmetric Cournot oligopoly

    Amir, R., Jin, J. Y. & Tröge, M., Feb 2017, In : Review of International Economics. 25, 1, p. 98-107 10 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Lower tax for minimum wage earners

    FitzRoy, F. & Jin, J., Feb 2017, St Andrews: University of St Andrews, 16 p. (School of Economics and Finance Discussion Paper; no. 1703).

    Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

  4. Higher tax for top earners

    FitzRoy, F. & Jin, J., Feb 2017, St Andrews: University of St Andrews, 25 p. (School of Economics and Finance Discussion Paper; no. 1702).

    Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper

Related by journal

  1. Journal of Economic Theory (Journal)

    Theodoros Diasakos (Reviewer)
    22 Jan 2010

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesPeer review of manuscripts

Related by journal

  1. Mood-driven choices and self-regulation

    Mihm, M. & Ozbek, K., 9 May 2018, In : Journal of Economic Theory. In press, 53 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Dynamic benchmark targeting

    Schlag, K. H. & Zapechelnyuk, A., 1 May 2017, In : Journal of Economic Theory. 169, p. 145-169 25 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Optimal robust bilateral trade: risk neutrality

    Čopič, J. & Ponsati Obiols, C., May 2016, In : Journal of Economic Theory. 163, p. 276-287

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Eliciting information from a committee

    Zapechelnyuk, A., Sep 2013, In : Journal of Economic Theory. 148, 5, p. 2049-2067 19 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 249489274