Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

On the Nature and Evolution of Imitation in the Animal Kingdom: Reappraisal of a Century of Research

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Standard

On the Nature and Evolution of Imitation in the Animal Kingdom : Reappraisal of a Century of Research. / Whiten, A.; Ham, R.

Advances in the Study of Behavior. C. ed. 1992. p. 239-283 (Advances in the Study of Behavior; Vol. 21, No. C).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Harvard

Whiten, A & Ham, R 1992, On the Nature and Evolution of Imitation in the Animal Kingdom: Reappraisal of a Century of Research. in Advances in the Study of Behavior. C edn, Advances in the Study of Behavior, no. C, vol. 21, pp. 239-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60146-1

APA

Whiten, A., & Ham, R. (1992). On the Nature and Evolution of Imitation in the Animal Kingdom: Reappraisal of a Century of Research. In Advances in the Study of Behavior (C ed., pp. 239-283). (Advances in the Study of Behavior; Vol. 21, No. C). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60146-1

Vancouver

Whiten A, Ham R. On the Nature and Evolution of Imitation in the Animal Kingdom: Reappraisal of a Century of Research. In Advances in the Study of Behavior. C ed. 1992. p. 239-283. (Advances in the Study of Behavior; C). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60146-1

Author

Whiten, A. ; Ham, R. / On the Nature and Evolution of Imitation in the Animal Kingdom : Reappraisal of a Century of Research. Advances in the Study of Behavior. C. ed. 1992. pp. 239-283 (Advances in the Study of Behavior; C).

Bibtex - Download

@inbook{77e2421b8081421db17fb2e220ecea78,
title = "On the Nature and Evolution of Imitation in the Animal Kingdom: Reappraisal of a Century of Research",
abstract = "Systematic research on imitation has been pursued for over a century, but methods and conclusions generated in this time have come under strong attack in recent years. Among the most influential ideas have been several that date back to the beginnings of the field in the nineteenth century. In the present article, four of these are distinguished and their consequences and reappraisal in the present century are examined. First, despite early recognition of varieties of imitation, distinctions now made between a greater number of processes by which one animal can come to act like another mean that many conclusions drawn in the first half of this century require revision. Second (and closely related to these theoretical distinctions), experimental paradigms developed in the nineteenth century have been adhered to for much of the present one; only relatively recently have techniques been invented that can adequately distinguish imitation from a range of imitative-like processes. This is important because the latter have important social and cognitive implications in their own right. Third, early assumptions about phylogenetic differences in imitative ability-particularly the superiority of primates-have been reinforced by both observational and experimental studies for much of the present century. Results obtained in recent studies have combined with reappraisal of earlier ones to question these phylogenetic differences. We argue that imitation is as yet unproved in monkeys, whereas chimpanzees (and possibly other apes) share with humans an imitative capacity consistent with other aspects of social cognition examined in recent research. Fourth, it was early argued that auditory-vocal imitation (characteristic of many birds) is distinct from visual imitation (shown by mammals). We use recent research findings to suggest why visual imitation may exert greater computational demands, but also review new studies suggesting that a dichotomy between the vocal imitation of birds and the visual imitation of encephalized mammals is too simplistic to accommodate all the phenomena.",
author = "A. Whiten and R. Ham",
year = "1992",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60146-1",
language = "English",
series = "Advances in the Study of Behavior",
number = "C",
pages = "239--283",
booktitle = "Advances in the Study of Behavior",
edition = "C",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - CHAP

T1 - On the Nature and Evolution of Imitation in the Animal Kingdom

T2 - Reappraisal of a Century of Research

AU - Whiten, A.

AU - Ham, R.

PY - 1992/1/1

Y1 - 1992/1/1

N2 - Systematic research on imitation has been pursued for over a century, but methods and conclusions generated in this time have come under strong attack in recent years. Among the most influential ideas have been several that date back to the beginnings of the field in the nineteenth century. In the present article, four of these are distinguished and their consequences and reappraisal in the present century are examined. First, despite early recognition of varieties of imitation, distinctions now made between a greater number of processes by which one animal can come to act like another mean that many conclusions drawn in the first half of this century require revision. Second (and closely related to these theoretical distinctions), experimental paradigms developed in the nineteenth century have been adhered to for much of the present one; only relatively recently have techniques been invented that can adequately distinguish imitation from a range of imitative-like processes. This is important because the latter have important social and cognitive implications in their own right. Third, early assumptions about phylogenetic differences in imitative ability-particularly the superiority of primates-have been reinforced by both observational and experimental studies for much of the present century. Results obtained in recent studies have combined with reappraisal of earlier ones to question these phylogenetic differences. We argue that imitation is as yet unproved in monkeys, whereas chimpanzees (and possibly other apes) share with humans an imitative capacity consistent with other aspects of social cognition examined in recent research. Fourth, it was early argued that auditory-vocal imitation (characteristic of many birds) is distinct from visual imitation (shown by mammals). We use recent research findings to suggest why visual imitation may exert greater computational demands, but also review new studies suggesting that a dichotomy between the vocal imitation of birds and the visual imitation of encephalized mammals is too simplistic to accommodate all the phenomena.

AB - Systematic research on imitation has been pursued for over a century, but methods and conclusions generated in this time have come under strong attack in recent years. Among the most influential ideas have been several that date back to the beginnings of the field in the nineteenth century. In the present article, four of these are distinguished and their consequences and reappraisal in the present century are examined. First, despite early recognition of varieties of imitation, distinctions now made between a greater number of processes by which one animal can come to act like another mean that many conclusions drawn in the first half of this century require revision. Second (and closely related to these theoretical distinctions), experimental paradigms developed in the nineteenth century have been adhered to for much of the present one; only relatively recently have techniques been invented that can adequately distinguish imitation from a range of imitative-like processes. This is important because the latter have important social and cognitive implications in their own right. Third, early assumptions about phylogenetic differences in imitative ability-particularly the superiority of primates-have been reinforced by both observational and experimental studies for much of the present century. Results obtained in recent studies have combined with reappraisal of earlier ones to question these phylogenetic differences. We argue that imitation is as yet unproved in monkeys, whereas chimpanzees (and possibly other apes) share with humans an imitative capacity consistent with other aspects of social cognition examined in recent research. Fourth, it was early argued that auditory-vocal imitation (characteristic of many birds) is distinct from visual imitation (shown by mammals). We use recent research findings to suggest why visual imitation may exert greater computational demands, but also review new studies suggesting that a dichotomy between the vocal imitation of birds and the visual imitation of encephalized mammals is too simplistic to accommodate all the phenomena.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957153551&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60146-1

DO - 10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60146-1

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:77957153551

T3 - Advances in the Study of Behavior

SP - 239

EP - 283

BT - Advances in the Study of Behavior

ER -

Related by author

  1. Social learning from media: the need for a culturally diachronic developmental psychology

    Nielsen, M., Fong, F. T. K. & Whiten, A., 24 Jun 2021, (E-pub ahead of print) Advances in Child Development and Behavior. JAI Press

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

  2. A deepening understanding of animal culture suggests lessons for conservation

    Brakes, P., Carroll, E. L., Dall, S., Keith, S., McGregor, P., Mesnick, S., Noad, M., Rendell, L., Robbins, M., Rutz, C., Thorton, A., Whiten, A., Whiting, M., Aplin, L., Bearhop, S., Ciucci, P., Fishlock, V., Ford, J., Notarbartolo di Sciara, G., Simmonds, M. & 5 others, Spina, F., Wade, P., Whithead, H., Williams, J. & Garland, E. C., 28 Apr 2021, In: Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 288, 1949, 10 p., 20202718.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

  3. The psychological reach of culture in animals’ lives

    Whiten, A., 27 Apr 2021, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Current Directions in Psychological Science. OnlineFirst, 17 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. The burgeoning reach of animal culture

    Whiten, A., 2 Apr 2021, In: Science. 372, 6537, eabe6514.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

  5. Chimpanzees’ behavioral flexibility, social tolerance and use of tool-composites in a progressively challenging foraging problem

    Harrison, R. A., van Leeuwen, E. & Whiten, A., 19 Feb 2021, In: iScience. 24, 2, 102033.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

ID: 266958645

Top