Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Orientation to the sun by animals and its interaction with crypsis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

1. Orientation with respect to the sun has been observed in a wide range of species and has generally been interpreted in terms of thermoregulation and/or UV protection. For countershaded animals, orientation with respect to the sun may also result from the pressure to exploit the gradient of coloration optimally to enhance crypsis.
2. Here we use computational modelling to predict the optimal countershading pattern for an oriented body. We assess how camouflage performance declines as orientation varies using a computational model that incorporates realistic lighting environments.
3. Once an optimal countershading pattern for crypsis has been chosen, we determine separately how ultra-violet protection/irradiation and solar thermal inflow fluctuate with orientation.
4. We show that body orientations that could optimally use countershading to enhance crypsis are very similar to those that allow optimal solar heat inflow and ultra-violet protection.
5. Our findings suggest that crypsis has been overlooked as a selective pressure on orientation and that new experiments should be designed to tease apart the respective roles of these different selective pressures. We propose potential experiments that could achieve this.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1165-1177
JournalFunctional Ecology
Volume29
Issue number9
Early online date20 Jun 2015
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2015

    Research areas

  • Body orientation, Camouflage, Countershading, Crypsis, Thermal melanism, Thermoregulation, Ultra-violet protection

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Optimizing countershading camouflage

    Cuthill, I., Sanghera, S., Penacchio, O., Lovell, P. G., Ruxton, G. D. & Harris, J. 15 Nov 2016 In : Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 113, 46, p. 13093-13097 5 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Does countershading contribute to visual camouflage by concealing 3D shape?

    Penacchio, O., Lovell, P. G., Sanghera, S., Cuthill, I. C., Ruxton, G. D. & Harris, J. M. Mar 2016 In : Perception. 45, 3, p. 357-357 1 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalAbstract

  3. Does countershading impede efficient visual search?

    Penacchio, O., Lovell, P. G., Sanghera, S., Cuthill, I. C., Ruxton, G. D. & Harris, J. M. 2016 In : i-Perception. 7, 1, 1 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalAbstract

  4. 3D camouflage: exploiting photons to conceal form

    Penacchio, O., Lovell, P. G., Cuthill, I., Ruxton, G. D. & Harris, J. Oct 2015 In : American Naturalist. 186, 4, p. 553-563

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. Visual search using realistic camouflage: countershading is highly effective at deterring search.

    Penacchio, O., Lovell, G., Sanghera, S., Cuthill, I., Ruxton, G. & Harris, J. 1 Sep 2015 In : Journal of Vision. 15, 12, p. 968 1 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalAbstract

Related by journal

  1. High suckling rates and acoustic crypsis of humpback whale neonates maximise potential for mother–calf energy transfer

    Videsen, S. K. A., Bejder, L., Johnson, M. & Madsen, P. T. Aug 2017 In : Functional Ecology. 31, 8, p. 1561-1573

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Modelling the biological significance of behavioural change in coastal bottlenose dolphins in response to disturbance

    New, L. F., Harwood, J., Thomas, L., Donovan, C. R., Clark, J., Hastie, G. D., Thompson, P., Cheney, B., Scott Hayward, L. A. S. & Lusseau, D. 2013 In : Functional Ecology. 27, p. 314-322

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Seasonal bryophyte productivity in the sub-Arctic: a comparison with vascular plants

    Street, L. E., Stoy, P. C., Sommerkorn, M., Fletcher, B. J., Sloan, V. L., Hill, T. C. & Williams, M. Apr 2012 In : Functional Ecology. 26, 2, p. 365-378 14 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 175310912