Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Patients' preferences for visuals: differences in the preferred level of detail, type of background and type of frame of icons depicting organs between literate and low-literate people

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Mara van Beusekom, Mark Bos, Ron Wolterbeek, Henk-Jan Guchelaar, Jos van den Broek

School/Research organisations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate icons of organs with systematic variations in design to provide directions for the development of pictograms that support patient leaflets targeted at a low-literate audience.

METHODS: In interview questionnaires, 191 pharmacy visitors (IJsselstein, The Netherlands), indicated for four organs in which image the organ was represented most clearly. The icons vary in level of detail of the depicted organ, in the organs that are shown in the background, and in how much of the body is shown as frame. Participants' literacy was determined through the Dutch Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM-D).

RESULTS: For the three internal organs, the intestines, lungs and kidneys, low-literate participants were more likely than literate participants to opt for less context in the form of the frame of the body.

CONCLUSION: When the meaning of the visual is given, low-literate people prefer organ icons with less context of the body over a depiction of the whole body.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Since literate and low-literate people differ in perceptual preferences, continued involvement of people with limited literacy skills in the design process is essential to target the visuals to their needs.

Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)226-33
Number of pages8
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
Volume98
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2015

    Research areas

  • Adult, Audiovisual Aids, Community Participation/psychology, Comprehension, Female, Health Education, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Health Literacy, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Patient Preference, Surveys and Questionnaires

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. rEACH, research committee of EACH: Updates on activities

    Pieterse, A., Schouten, B., Amann, J., van Beusekom, M. M., Hillen, M. & van Weel-Baumgarten, E., 23 Jul 2019, 9 ed. 2 p. (Patient Education and Counseling)

    Research output: Book/ReportOther report

  2. Communication skills training for the radiotherapy team to manage cancer patients’ emotional concerns: a systematic review

    van Beusekom, M. M., Cameron, J., Bedi, C., Banks, E. & Humphris, G. M., 20 Apr 2019, In : BMJ Open. 9, 11 p., e025420.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

  3. Express rather than impress: Benefits of the rEACH summer school for early-career researchers in the field of health communication

    Amann, J., Jongerius, C., Palis, H., Rossi, M. G., Altendorf, M., van Beusekom, M. M., de Looper, M., Medendorp, N., Ofstad, E., Houwen, J. & Duprez, V., Feb 2019, 2 p. (Patient Education and Counseling)

    Research output: Book/ReportOther report

  4. The extent and effects of patient involvement in pictogram design for written drug information: a short systematic review

    van Beusekom, M. M., Kerkhoven, A. H., Bos, M. J. W., Guchelaar, H-J. & van den Broek, J. M., Jun 2018, In : Drug Discovery Today. 23, 6, p. 1312-1318 7 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Related by journal

  1. Patient Education and Counseling (Journal)

    Anita Helen Laidlaw (Reviewer)
    20102012

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesPeer review of manuscripts

Related by journal

  1. Developing the International Association for Communication in Healthcare (EACH) to address current challenges of health communication

    Rubinelli, S., Silverman, J., Aelbrecht, K., Deveugele, M., Finset, A., Humphris, G., Martin, P., Rosenbaum, M., van Dulmen, S. & van Weel-Baumgarten, E., Jun 2019, In : Patient Education and Counseling. 102, 6, p. 1217-1221 5 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Mimicking non-verbal emotional expressions and empathy development in simulated consultations: an experimental feasibility study

    Zhou, Y. & Fischer, M. H., Feb 2018, In : Patient Education and Counseling. 101, 2, p. 304-309 6 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Pharmaceutical pictograms for low-literate patients: understanding, risk of false confidence, and evidence-based design strategies

    van Beusekom, M. M., Land-Zandstra, A. M., Bos, M. J. W., van den Broek, J. M. & Guchelaar, H-J., May 2017, In : Patient Education and Counseling. 100, 5, p. 966-973 8 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 259562808

Top