Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Pelagic movements of pacific leatherback turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) reveal the complex role of prey and ocean currents

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Robert Schilling Schick, Jason Roberts, Scott Eckert, James Clark, Helen Bailey, Fei Chai, Li Shi, Patrick Halpin

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Background: Leatherback turtles are renowned for their trans-oceanic migrations. However, despite numerous movement studies, the precise drivers of movement patterns in leatherbacks remain elusive. Many previous studies of leatherback turtles as well as other diving marine predators have analyzed surface movement patterns using only surface covariates. Since turtles and other marine predators spend the vast majority of their time diving under water, an analysis of movement patterns at depth should yield insight into what drives their movements.
Results: We analyzed the movement paths of 15 post-nesting adult female Pacific leatherback turtles, which were caught and tagged on three nesting beaches in Mexico. The temporal length of the tracks ranged from 32 to 436 days, and the spatial distance covered ranged from 1,532 km to 13,097 km. We analyzed these tracks using a movement model designed to yield inference on the parameters driving movement. Because the telemetry data included diving depths, we extended an earlier version of the model that examined surface only movements, and here analyze movements in 3-dimensions. We tested the effect of dynamic environmental covariates from a coupled biophysical oceanographic model on patch choice in diving leatherback turtles, and compared the effects of parameters measured at the surface and at depth. The covariates included distance to future patch, temperature, salinity, meridional current velocity (current in the north–south direction), zonal current velocity (current in the east–west direction), phytoplankton density, diatom density, micro-plankton density, and meso-zooplankton density. We found significant, i.e. non-zero, correlation between movement and the parameters for oceanic covariates in 8 of the tracks. Of particular note, for one turtle we observed a lack of correlation between movements and a modeled index of zooplankton at the surface, but a significant correlation between movements and zooplankton at depth. Two of the turtles express a preference for patches at depth with elevated diatoms, and 2 turtles prefer patches with higher mezozooplankton values at depth. In contrast, 4 turtles expressed a preference for elevated zooplankton patches at the surface, but not at depth. We suggest that our understanding of a marine predator’s response to the environment may change significantly depending upon the analytical frame of reference, i.e. whether relationships are examined at the surface, at depth, or at different temporal resolutions. Lastly, we tested the effects of accounting for ocean currents on the movement patterns and found that for 13 of the 15 turtles, the parameter governing distance to the next patch decreased.
Conclusions: Our results suggest that relationships derived from the analysis of surface tracks may not entirely explain movement patterns of this highly migratory species. Accounting for choices in the water column has shown that for certain individual turtles, what appears to be favourable habitat at depth is quantitatively different from that at the surface. This has implications for the analysis of the movements and diving behaviour of any top marine predator. The leatherback turtle is a deep diving reptile, and it is important to understand the subsurface variables that influence their movements if we are to precisely map the spatial dimensions of favorable leatherback habitat. These results present a new view into the drivers of diving patterns in turtles, and in particular represent a way of analyzing movements at depth that can be extended to other diving species.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number11
Number of pages14
JournalMovement Ecology
Volume1
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Nov 2013

    Research areas

  • Movement, Bayesian, Habitat suitability, Water column, Diving, Leatherback turtles, Marine predator, Dynamic covariates, Prey

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Understanding the population consequences of disturbance

    Pirotta, E., Booth, C. G., Costa, D. P., Fleishman, E., Kraus, S. D., Lusseau, D., Moretti, D., New, L. F., Schick, R. S., Schwarz, L. K., Simmons, S. E., Thomas, L., Tyack, P. L., Weise, M. J., Wells, R. S. & Harwood, J., 12 Sep 2018, In : Ecology and Evolution. Early View, 13 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

  2. MapMySmoke–a context aware mobile phone application targeted at smoking cessation

    Schick, R. S., Humphris, G. M., Kelsey, T. W., Marston, J. & Sampson, K., 22 Nov 2016.

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePoster

  3. Monitoring population-level responses of marine mammals to human activities

    Fleishman, E., Costa, D. P., Harwood, J., Kraus, S., Moretti, D., New, L. F., Schick, R. S., Schwarz, L. K., Simmons, S. E., Thomas, L. & Wells, R. S., Jul 2016, In : Marine Mammal Science. 32, 3, p. 1004-1021

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Movement Ecology (Journal)

    Will Cresswell (Reviewer)
    30 Aug 2018

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesPeer review of manuscripts

Related by journal

  1. Circular statistics meets practical limitations: a simulation-based Rao’s spacing test for non-continuous data

    Landler, L., Ruxton, G. D. & Malkemper, E. P., 10 May 2019, In : Movement Ecology. 7, 5 p., 15.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Potential path volume (PPV): a geometric estimator for space use in 3D

    Demšar, U. & Long, J. A., 29 Apr 2019, In : Movement Ecology. 7, 14 p., 14.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Activity seascapes highlight central place foraging strategies in marine predators that never stop swimming

    Papastamatiou, Y., Watanabe, Y., Demsar, U., Leos-Barajas, V., Bradley, D., Langrock, R., Weng, K., Lowe, C., Friedlander, A. & Caselle, J., 21 Jun 2018, In : Movement Ecology. 6, 15 p., 9.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Summer at the beach: spatio-temporal patterns of white shark occurrence along the inshore areas of False Bay, South Africa

    Kock, A. A., Photopoulou, T., Durbach, I., Mauff, K., Meÿer, M., Kotze, D., Griffiths, C. & O'Riain, M. J., 22 May 2018, In : Movement Ecology. 6, 13 p., 7.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. Navigating uncertain waters: a critical review of inferring foraging behaviour from location and dive data in pinnipeds

    Carter, M. I. D., Bennett, K. A., Embling, C. B., Hosegood, P. J. & Russell, D. J. F., 26 Oct 2016, In : Movement Ecology. 4, 20 p., 25.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

ID: 84738893