Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Phases of physics in J.D. Forbes’ Dissertation Sixth for the Encyclopaedia Britannica (1856)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

School/Research organisations

Abstract

This paper takes James David Forbes’ Encyclopaedia Britannica entry, Dissertation Sixth, as a lens to examine physics as a cognitive, practical, and social, enterprise. Forbes wrote this survey of eighteenth- and nineteenth-century mathematical and physical sciences, in 1852-6, when British “physics” was at a pivotal point in its history, situated between a discipline identified by its mathematical methods – originating in France - and one identified by its university laboratory institutions. Contemporary encyclopaedias provided a nexus for publishers, the book trade, readers, and men of science, in the formation of physics as a field. Forbes was both a witness, whose account of the progress of physics or natural philosophy can be explored at face value, and an agent, who exploited the opportunity offered by the Encyclopaedia Britannica in the mid nineteenth century to enrol the broadly educated public, and scientific collective, illuminating the connection between the definition of physics and its forms of social practice. Forbes used the terms “physics” and “natural philosophy” interchangeably. He portrayed the field as progressed by the natural genius of great men, who curated the discipline within an associational culture that engendered true intellectual spirit. Although this societal mechanism was becoming ineffective, Forbes did not see university institutions as the way forward. Instead, running counter to his friend William Whewell, he advocated inclusion of the mechanical arts (engineering), and a strictly limited role for mathematics. He revealed tensions when the widely accepted discovery-based historiography conflicted with intellectual and moral worth, reflecting a nineteenth-century concern with spirit that cuts across twentieth-century questions about discipline and field.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages26
JournalHistory of Science
VolumeOnlineFirst
Early online date3 Dec 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 Dec 2018

    Research areas

  • J.D. Forbes, James David Forbes, Encyclopaedia Britannica, Nineteenth-century science, Natural philosophy, Discipline formation, Associational culture, Scientific discovery, Scientific genius, Intellectual spirit

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Editorial

    Falconer, I., 2 Jan 2020, In : British Journal for the History of Mathematics. 35, 1, p. 1-2 2 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

  2. Vortices and atoms in the Maxwellian era

    Falconer, I. J., 30 Sep 2019, In : Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. A, Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences . 377, 2158, 15 p., 20180451.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

  3. Paris 1907: the observer vs the administrator

    Peres, T., Gomez Mena, J., Robertson, E., Falconer, I. & O'Connor, J., 1 Feb 2019, In : Astronomy & Geophysics. 60, 1, p. 1.40-1.42

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Online resource for the history of astronomy

    Talbot, G., Shand, I., Falconer, I., Robertson, E. & O'Connor, J., 1 Feb 2018, In : Astronomy and Geophysics. 59, 1, p. 1.20-1.21 aty025.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Reputation in a box. Objects, communication and trust in late 18th-century botanical networks

    Easterby-Smith, S., 1 Jun 2015, In : History of Science. 53, 2, p. 180-208 28 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Green treasures and paper floras: The business of Mutis in New Granada (1783-1808)

    Marcaida, J. R. & Pimentel, J., 1 Sep 2014, In : History of Science. 52, 3, p. 277-296 20 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 256188128

Top