Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Point process models for spatio-temporal distance sampling data from a large-scale survey of blue whales

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

DOI

Open Access permissions

Open

Abstract

Distance sampling is a widely used method for estimating wildlife population abundance. The fact that conventional distance sampling methods are partly design-based constrains the spatial resolution at which animal density can be estimated using these methods. Estimates are usually obtained at survey stratum level. For an endangered species such as the blue whale, it is desirable to estimate density and abundance at a finer spatial scale than stratum. Temporal variation in the spatial structure is also important. We formulate the process generating distance sampling data as a thinned spatial point process and propose model-based inference using a spatial log-Gaussian Cox process. The method adopts a flexible stochastic partial differential equation (SPDE) approach to model spatial structure in density that is not accounted for by explanatory variables, and integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA) for Bayesian inference. It allows simultaneous fitting of detection and density models and permits prediction of density at an arbitrarily fine scale. We estimate blue whale density in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean from thirteen shipboard surveys conducted over 22 years. We find that higher blue whale density is associated with colder sea surface temperatures in space, and although there is some positive association between density and mean annual temperature, our estimates are consitent with no trend in density across years. Our analysis also indicates that there is substantial spatially structured variation in density that is not explained by available covariates.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2270-2297
JournalAnnals of Applied Statistics
Volume11
Issue number4
Early online date28 Dec 2017
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2017

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Measuring temporal trends in biodiversity

    Buckland, S. T., Yuan, Y. & Marcon, E. Oct 2017 In : Advances in Statistical Analysis. 101, 4, p. 461-474

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

  2. Model-based approaches to deal with detectability: a comment on Hutto (2016a)

    Marques, T. A., Thomas, L., Kery, M., Buckland, S. T., Borchers, D. L., Rexstad, E., Fewster, R. M., Mackenzie, D. I., Royle, J. A., Guillera-Arroita, G., Handel, C. M., Pavlacky, D. C. & Camp, R. J. Jul 2017 In : Ecological Applications. 27, 5, p. 1694-1698 5 p.

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewLetter

  3. Using species proportions to quantify turnover in biodiversity

    Yuan, Y., Buckland, S. T., Harrison, P., Foss, S. & Johnston, A. Jun 2016 In : Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics. 21, 2, p. 363-381

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

  4. Quantifying turnover in biodiversity of British breeding birds

    Harrison, P., Yuan, Y., Buckland, S. T., Oedekoven, C. S., Elston, D. A., Brewer, M., Johnston, A. & Pierce-Higgins, J. 22 Feb 2016 In : Journal of Applied Ecology. 53, 2, p. 469-478 10 p.

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

Related by journal

  1. Capture-recapture abundance estimation using a semi-complete data likelihood approach

    King, R., T. McClintock, B., Kidney, D. & Borchers, D. Mar 2016 In : Annals of Applied Statistics. 10, 1, p. 264-285

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

  2. Maximum likelihood estimation of mark-recapture-recovery models in the presence of continuous covariates

    Langrock, R. & King, R. 2013 In : Annals of Applied Statistics. 7, 3, p. 1709-1732 24 p.

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

  3. A toolbox for fitting complex spatial point process models using integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA)

    Illian, J. B., Sorbye, S. H. & Rue, H. Dec 2012 In : Annals of Applied Statistics. 6, 4, p. 1499-1530 32 p.

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

ID: 243307360