Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Producing airpower: the rise and fall of neo-liberalism’s defence agenda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Open Access Status

  • Embargoed (until 18/07/20)

Author(s)

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Neo-liberalism stands out as one of the most potent contemporary political philosophies. Neo-liberal governments re-fashioned states’ economies and neo-liberal ideas came to dominate international financial organizations. Perhaps nowhere are the challenges of translating neo-liberal theories into policy more apparent than in defence. The existing institutions and practices whereby states produce military power are often anathema to neo-liberal concepts of efficiency. Bureaucratic armed forces and national champion defence firms, within this context, clash with neo-liberalism’s ideological hostility to hierarchical-bureaucratic systems and belief that market mechanisms generate efficiency. Neo-liberal governments therefore developed policies for applying the philosophy’s economic formulae to defence. Two broad categories of reforms—enhancing inter-firm competition for contracts and outsourcing activities to the private sector—emerged as central to the neo-liberal defence agenda. Surprisingly, in light of neo-liberal policies’ adoption by militarily active states, no study has systematically examined these reforms’ content and impact. My article fills this lacuna by examining the state—the United Kingdom—that most consistently enacted neo-liberal defence reforms. To preview the conclusion, neo-liberalism did not prove the panacea that proponents espoused. This agenda’s internal logic nevertheless drove policymakers, from Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher’s regime (1979-90) onwards, to compensate for the negative externalities generated by one set of neo-liberal reforms by introducing further market mechanisms. Neo-liberal policies’ initially disappointing outcomes thus resulted in further neo-liberal reforms rather than a reassessment of the philosophy’s suitability to this domain. Nevertheless, each of the neo-liberal defence agenda’s two pillars suffered from internal contradictions that ultimately stymied their application.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)873-891
Number of pages43
JournalNew Political Economy
Volume24
Issue number6
Early online date18 Jan 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2019

    Research areas

  • Neo-liberalism, Air power, Armaments, Political economy, Britain, Procurement, Defense, Margaret Thatcher, Outsourcing, Competition policy

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Armaments after autonomy: military adaptation and the drive for domestic defence industries

    DeVore, M. R., 30 May 2019, In : Journal of Strategic Studies. Latest Articles, 35 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Dynamics of insurgent innovation: how Hezbollah and other non-state actors develop new capabilities

    DeVore, M. R., Stähli, A. B. & Franke, U. E., 2019, In : Comparative Strategy. 38, 4, p. 371-400 30 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Preserving power after empire: the credibility trap and France's intervention in Chad, 1968-72

    DeVore, M. R., 20 Sep 2018, In : War in History. Online First

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Anarchy's anatomy: two-tiered security systems and Libya’s civil wars

    De Vore, M. R. & Stähli, A., 16 Jul 2018, In : Journal of Strategic Studies. In press

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Defying Convergence: Globalisation and Varieties of Defence-Industrial Capitalism

    De Vore, M. R., 2015, In : New Political Economy. 20, 4, p. 569-593

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. The International Financial Architecture and the Limits to Neoliberal Hegemony

    Thirkell-White, B., Mar 2007, In : New Political Economy. 12, 1, p. 19-41 23 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Human rights watch

    Watson, A. M. S., Sep 2004, In : New Political Economy. 9, 3, p. 441-453 13 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Seen but not heard: The role of the child in international political economy

    Watson, A. M. S., Mar 2004, In : New Political Economy. 9, 1, p. 3-21 19 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 256979632

Top