Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Public preferences for multiple dimensions of bird biodiversity at the coast: insights for the cultural ecosystem services framework

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Biodiversity is valuable to society, including through its contribution to cultural benefits: “the non-material benefits people obtain from biodiversity and ecosystem services through spiritual enrichment, cognitive development, reflection, recreation, and aesthetic experiences”. Biodiversity encompasses numerous measures, but the distinct values of these measures have been little studied. We conducted a discrete choice experiment to elicit respondents’ (n = 3,000) willingness to pay for increases in four measures of bird diversity in UK coastal ecosystems: number of bird species (species richness), number of individual birds (abundance), probability of seeing rare or unusual bird species, and probability of seeing large flocks of birds (wildlife spectacles). Respondents had a positive willingness to pay (through one-time voluntary donations) for increases in all four measures (mean £3 to £5 per household). However, using latent class analysis we found considerable heterogeneity of preferences, identifying four classes of respondents with strikingly different levels of marginal willingness to pay for the four measures. Income, age, environmental activity, visits to environmental settings, and gender were important determinants of class membership. While focusing on birds, our results demonstrate the importance of a multi-dimensional conceptualisation of biodiversity in broader ecosystem management, rather than focussing on a single aspect such as species richness or abundance. Our findings also highlight the implications of heterogeneous public preferences for biodiversity for conservationists, planners, shoreline managers and developers. These need to be considered in the development of new frameworks for ecosystem services, and when planning and funding conservation actions so that the cultural benefits will accrue across a range of social groups.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number106571
JournalEstuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
VolumeIn press
Early online date7 Jan 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 7 Jan 2020

    Research areas

  • Coastal management, Coastal zones, Discrete choice experiments, Ecosystem services, Willingness to pay, Valuation

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Fringe of Gold: Oceans from the perspective of our coast

    Williams, B., Bates, C. R., Searle, O., Stojanovic, T. & South, A. M., 10 Nov 2020

    Research output: Non-textual formDigital or Visual Products

  2. Governance as a framework to theorise and evaluate marine planning

    Stojanovic, T. & Gee, K., Oct 2020, In: Marine Policy. 120, 104115.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Multilevel governance of coastal flood risk reduction: a public finance perspective

    Bisaro, A., de Bel, M., Hinkel, J., Kok, S., Stojanovic, T. & Ware, D., Oct 2020, In: Environmental Science and Policy. 112, p. 203-212

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Does marine planning enable progress towards adaptive governance of marine systems? Lessons from Scotland’s regional marine planning process

    Greenhill, L., Stojanovic, T. & Tett, P., 24 Mar 2020, In: Maritime Studies. First Online, 17 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  5. Socio-cultural dimensions of marine spatial planning

    McKinley, E., Acott, T. & Stojanovic, T., 24 Jan 2019, Maritime spatial planning: past, present, future. Zaucha, J. & Gee, K. (eds.). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 151-174 24 p.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Related by journal

  1. Comparing the network structure and resilience of two benthic estuarine systems following the implementation of nutrient mitigation actions

    Watson, S. C. L., Beaumont, N. J., Widdicombe, S. & Paterson, D. M., 7 Jan 2019, In: Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. In press

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Economic impacts of marine ecological change: review and recent contributions of the VECTORS project on European marine waters

    Groeneveld, R. A., Bartelings, H., Börger, T., Bosello, F., Buisman, E., Delpiazzo, E., Eboli, F., Fernandes, J. A., Hamon, K. G., Hattam, C., Loureiro, M., Nunes, P. A. L. D., Piwowarczyk, J., Schasfoort, F. E., Simons, S. L. & Walker, A. N., Feb 2018, In: Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 201, p. 152-163

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. The role of interdisciplinary collaboration for stated preference methods to value marine environmental goods and ecosystem services

    Börger, T., Böhnke-Henrichs, A., Hattam, C., Piwowarczyk, J., Schasfoort, F. & Austen, M. C., 5 Feb 2018, In: Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 201, p. 140-151

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. VECTORS of change in the marine environment: Ecosystem and economic impacts and management implications

    Austen, M. C., Crowe, T. P., Elliott, M., Paterson, D. M., Peck, M. A. & Piraino, S., 5 Feb 2018, In: Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 201, p. 1-6 6 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

ID: 265684163

Top