Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Rebuilding beluga stocks in West Greenland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

DOI

Open Access permissions

Open

Author(s)

M. P. Heide-Jørgensen, R. G. Hansen, S. Fossette, N. H. Nielsen, D. L. Borchers, H. Stern, L. Witting

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Decisions about sustainable exploitation levels of marine resources are often based on inadequate data, but are nevertheless required for practical purposes. We describe one exception where abundance estimates spanning 30 years and catch data spanning more than 40 years were used in a Bayesian assessment model of belugas Delphinapterus leucas off West Greenland. The model was updated with data from a visual aerial survey on the wintering ground in 2012. Methods that take account of stochastic animal availability by using independent estimates of forward and perpendicular sighting distances were used to estimate beluga abundance. A model that appears to be robust to the presence of a few large groups yielded an estimate of 7456 belugas (cv = 0.44), similar to a conventional distance-sampling estimate. A mark–recapture distance analysis that corrects for perception and availability bias estimated the abundance to be 9072 whales (cv = 0.32). Increasing distance of beluga sightings from shore was correlated with decreasing sea ice cover, suggesting that belugas expand their distribution offshore (i.e. westward in this context) with the reduction of coastal sea ice. A model with high (0.98) adult survival estimated a decline from 18 600 (90% CI: 13 400, 26 000) whales in 1970 to 8000 (90% CI: 5830, 11 200) in 2004. The decline was probably a result of a period with exceptionally large catches. Following the introduction of catch limits in 2004, the model projects an increase to 11 600 (90% CI: 6760, 17 600) individuals in 2020 (assuming annual removals of 294 belugas after 2014). If the annual removal level is fixed at 300 individuals, a low-survival (0.97) model predicts a 75% probability of an increasing population during 2015–2020. Reduced removal rates due to catch limits and the more offshore, less accessible distribution of the whales are believed to be responsible for the initial signs of population recovery.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)282-293
Number of pages11
JournalAnimal Conservation
Volume20
Issue number3
Early online date11 Nov 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2017

    Research areas

  • Aerial survey, Bayesian assessment, Hidden Markov model, Line transect, Beluga, Sea ice cover, Abundance estimates, Cetaceans

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Fast, flexible alternatives to regular grid designs for spatial capture-recapture

    Durbach, I. N., Borchers, D. L., Sutherland, C. & Sharma, K., Feb 2021, In: Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 12, 2, p. 298-310

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. A latent capture history model for digital aerial surveys

    Borchers, D. L., Nightingale, P., Stevenson, B. C. & Fewster, R. M., 10 Dec 2020, In: Biometrics. Early View, 12 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Uncovering ecological state dynamics with hidden Markov models

    McClintock, B. T., Langrock, R., Gimenez, O., Cam, E., Borchers, D. L., Glennie, R. & Patterson, T. A., 19 Oct 2020, In: Ecology Letters. Early View, 26 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Using continuous-time spatial capture–recapture models to make inference about animal activity patterns

    Distiller, G. B., Borchers, D. L., Foster, R. J. & Harmsen, B. J., 9 Oct 2020, In: Ecology and Evolution. Early View, 12 p., e6822.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  5. Listening and watching: do camera traps or acoustic sensors more efficiently detect wild chimpanzees in an open habitat?

    Crunchant, A-S., Borchers, D., Kühl, H. & Piel, A., Apr 2020, In: Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 11, 4, p. 542-552

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. Fishing for the facts: river dolphin bycatch in a small-scale freshwater fishery in Bangladesh

    Dewhurst-Richman, N. I., Jones, J. P. G., Northridge, S., Ahmed, B., Brook, S., Freeman, R., Jepson, P., Mahood, S. P. & Turvey, S. T., 1 Aug 2019, In: Animal Conservation. Early View

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Can fear conditioning repel California sea lions from fishing activities?

    Schakner, Z. A., Götz, T., Janik, V. M. & Blumstein, D. T., Oct 2017, In: Animal Conservation. 20, 5, p. 425-432 8 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Landscape-scale effects of single- and multiple small wind turbines on bat activity

    Minderman, J., Gillis, M., Daly, H. & Park, K., Oct 2017, In: Animal Conservation. 20, 5, p. 455-462

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. Animal Conservation (Journal)

    Monica Arso Civil (Reviewer)

    Mar 2017

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesPeer review of manuscripts

ID: 247649478

Top