Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Recognizing penguins: audience expectation, cognitive genre theory, and the ending of Mark’s Gospel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Open Access Status

  • Embargoed (until 12/10/19)

Author(s)

School/Research organisations

Abstract

This study exposes shortcomings of arguments that view an “open ending” theory of Mark as a modern construct that would have made little sense to an ancient audience. It looks at 1st century genre expectations in light of cognitive genre theory and argues that a reader-response approach to Mark’s ending is not only appropriate but also desirable. First, it describes and assesses interpretative issues surrounding Mark’s ending. Second, it discusses ways of approaching Mark’s ending in light of genre expectations, building on a literary approach to genre with a cognitive (psychological) approach. Third, it offers an interpretation of Mark’s ending in light of its fit with Greco-Roman bios and in terms of cognitive models. It shows how Mark develops a pattern of imitation between Jesus and his disciples that, at the end, invites the audience to reflect on and respond to the person of Jesus and his role as the exemplar of discipleship.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)273-292
JournalCatholic Biblical Quarterly
Volume80
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2018

    Research areas

  • Genre theory, Greco-Roman bios, Gospel of Mark, Ending of Mark, Cognitive theories

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. The Gospel of Mark. The New International Greek Testament Commentary

    Shively, E. E., Still, T. (ed.) & Goodacre, M. (ed.), 2026, (In preparation) 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

    Research output: Book/ReportBook

  2. The Invention of the Gospel: Genre, Meaning, and Identity

    Shively, E. E., 2021, (In preparation) Oxford University Press.

    Research output: Book/ReportBook

  3. Philemon. Commentaries on Social Identity in the New Testament

    Shively, E. E., Ehrensperger, K. (ed.) & Esler, P. (ed.), 2020, (In preparation) Edinburgh: T&T Clark.

    Research output: Book/ReportBook

  4. A Critique of Richard Burridge’s Genre Theory: From a One-Dimensional to a Multi-Dimensional Approach to Gospel Genre

    Shively, E. E., 2020, (Submitted) The Gospels and Ancient Narrative Literary Criticism. Calhoun, M., Moessner, D. & Niklas, T. (eds.). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, (WUNT).

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

  5. Literary Approaches

    Shively, E. E., 2019, (Accepted/In press) Cambridge Companion to the New Testament. Gray, P. (ed.). Cambridge University Press

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Related by journal

  1. The Letter to the Galatians: The Bible in Medieval Tradition

    Hafemann, S. J., Oct 2016, In : Catholic Biblical Quarterly. 78, 4, p. 782-783 2 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article review

  2. Psalm 22 and the 'Servants' of Isaiah 54; 56-66

    Lyons, M. A., Oct 2015, In : Catholic Biblical Quarterly. 77, 4, p. 640-656

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 248525099