Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Reframing decommissioning as energy infrastructural investment: a comparative analysis of motivational frames in Scotland and Germany

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Decommissioning is often understood to mark the end of an energy infrastructure, associated supply network or even an entire industry. The long-term nature of this process for large scale infrastructure offers, however, a strategic opportunity for businesses. The paper argues that pro-industry Scottish business interests have proactively reframed decommissioning oil and gas infrastructure as an investment opportunity, whereas their German counterparts in the nuclear industry have struggled to mobilize a positive reframing of the phase-out. A detailed analysis of eighteen interviews reveals critical insight into how each industry approaches mobilizing support for their interests through motivational framing in the decommissioning context. Four key differences between the case studies (materiality, industry trajectories, rise of small business and national political identity) are then identified and reflected upon.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)31-38
Number of pages8
JournalEnergy Research and Social Science
Volume41
Early online date13 Apr 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Jun 2018

    Research areas

  • Decommissioning, Energy investment , Energy infrastructure, Oil and gas, Nuclear, Political economy

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Response to “Monyei, Jenkins, Serestina and Adewumi examining energy sufficiency and energy mobility in the global south through the energy justice framework”

    Todd, I., De Groot, J., Mose, T., McCauley, D. & Heffron, R. J., Sep 2019, In : Energy Policy. 132, p. 44-46 3 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

  2. Energy justice in the transition to low carbon energy systems: exploring key themes in interdisciplinary research

    McCauley, D. A., Ramasar, V., Heffron, R., Sovacool, B., Mebratu, D. & Mundaca, L., 1 Jan 2019, In : Applied Energy. 233-234, p. 916-921 6 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Balancing the energy trilemma through the Energy Justice Metric

    Heffron, R., McCauley, D. & Zarazua de Rubens, G., 1 Nov 2018, In : Applied Energy. 229, p. 1191-1201 11 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. The emergence of the ‘social licence to operate’ in the extractive industries?

    Heffron, R., Downes, L., Ramirez Rodriguez, O. M. & McCauley, D., 24 Oct 2018, In : Resources Policy. 59

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. Energy justice and policy change: an historical political analysis of the German nuclear phase-out

    McCauley, D., Brown, A., Rehner, R., Heffron, R. & van de Graaff, S., 15 Oct 2018, In : Applied Energy. 228, p. 317-323 7 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Energy Research and Social Science (Journal)

    Darren McCauley (Reviewer)
    2014 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesPeer review of manuscripts

Related by journal

  1. Exploring the anthropology of energy: ethnography, energy and ethics

    Smith, J. & High, M., Aug 2017, In : Energy Research and Social Science. 30, p. 1-6

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Challenging obduracy: How local communities transform the energy system

    van der Schoor, T., van Lente, H., Scholtens, B. & Peine, A., Mar 2016, In : Energy Research and Social Science. 13, p. 94-105 12 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Energy justice: a conceptual review

    Jenkins, K. E. H., McCauley, D., Heffron, R., Stephan, H. & Rehner, R. W. M., Jan 2016, In : Energy Research and Social Science. 11, p. 174-182

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 252796720

Top