Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Relationships between student characteristics and self-, peer and tutor evaluations of oral presentations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Author(s)

A. Mark Langan, David Michael Shuker, W. Rod Cullen, David Penney, Richard F. Preziosi, C. Philip Wheater

School/Research organisations

Abstract

There are many influences on how assessors grade themselves and others. Oral presentations are useful for exploring such factors in peer, self- and tutor marked assessments, being rapidly completed and assessed, commonly used in HE and very difficult to anonymize. This opportunistic study examined the effects of gender and level of attainment on the triangulation of marks awarded to student presenters. Grades generated by peer assessment were associated more strongly with tutor-awarded marks than those from self- assessment. For self- assessment there was a strong effect of gender (female students undervalued their performance compared with tutor grades). Peer assessment produced higher marks than from tutors, perhaps because of the close-knit community developed during residential courses. For tutor marks, the greatest variability was at the lower end of the scale, whereas peer assessors were most variable when marking students who self- evaluated or peer assessed highly. Students awarded a narrower range of marks to peers compared with tutors, but when self- assessing used a larger range. Presentations by students who admitted to little sleep the night before received lower grades from both peers and tutors, but this was not reflected by self- assessments, suggesting they were unaware of their poorer performances. Sessions with fewer talks (four rather than seven) reduced the 'dip' in marks previously observed in the middle of sessions. Findings are discussed in the context of bias in this mode of assessment.

Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179-190
Number of pages12
JournalAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Research areas

  • HIGHER-EDUCATION, METAANALYSIS

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. The definition of sexual selection: a response to comments on Shuker and Kvarnemo

    Shuker, D. M. & Kvarnemo, C., 9 Aug 2021, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Behavioral Ecology. Advance articles

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

  2. The definition of sexual selection

    Shuker, D. M. & Kvarnemo, C., 7 Aug 2021, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Behavioral Ecology. Advance Article, 14 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Context-dependent use of visual cues in the shell selection behaviour of the hermit crab Pagurus bernhardus

    Rimmer, J. E. V., Todd, C. D. & Shuker, D. M., Jul 2021, In: Behavioural Processes. 188, 104414.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. The rationality of decisions depends on behavioural context

    Glaser, G. L., Miller, M. C., Healy, S. D. & Shuker, D. M., 5 Dec 2020, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Behavioural Processes. In-press, 104293.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  5. Same-sex sexual behaviour

    Balfour, V. L. & Shuker, D. M., 16 Nov 2020, In: Current Biology. 30, 22, p. R1345-R1346

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. Excellence in university assessment: learning from award-winning practice, by David Carless, London, Routledge

    Carver, M. & Wilder, K., 25 May 2017, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 43, 2, p. 339-340

    Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article review

  2. Assessment for learning in higher education, by Kay Sambell, Liz McDowell and Catherine Montgomery, London, Routledge

    Bloxham, S. & Carver, M., 2014, In: Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 39, 1, p. 123-126 4 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article reviewpeer-review

ID: 2086761

Top