Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Relationships between student characteristics and self-, peer and tutor evaluations of oral presentations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

A. Mark Langan, David Michael Shuker, W. Rod Cullen, David Penney, Richard F. Preziosi, C. Philip Wheater

School/Research organisations

Abstract

There are many influences on how assessors grade themselves and others. Oral presentations are useful for exploring such factors in peer, self- and tutor marked assessments, being rapidly completed and assessed, commonly used in HE and very difficult to anonymize. This opportunistic study examined the effects of gender and level of attainment on the triangulation of marks awarded to student presenters. Grades generated by peer assessment were associated more strongly with tutor-awarded marks than those from self- assessment. For self- assessment there was a strong effect of gender (female students undervalued their performance compared with tutor grades). Peer assessment produced higher marks than from tutors, perhaps because of the close-knit community developed during residential courses. For tutor marks, the greatest variability was at the lower end of the scale, whereas peer assessors were most variable when marking students who self- evaluated or peer assessed highly. Students awarded a narrower range of marks to peers compared with tutors, but when self- assessing used a larger range. Presentations by students who admitted to little sleep the night before received lower grades from both peers and tutors, but this was not reflected by self- assessments, suggesting they were unaware of their poorer performances. Sessions with fewer talks (four rather than seven) reduced the 'dip' in marks previously observed in the middle of sessions. Findings are discussed in the context of bias in this mode of assessment.

Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179-190
Number of pages12
JournalAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Research areas

  • HIGHER-EDUCATION, METAANALYSIS

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Validating the demethylating effects of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine in insects requires a whole-genome approach (A reply to Ellers et al.)

    Cook, N., Parker, D. J., Tauber, E., Pannebakker, B. A. & Shuker, D. M., Sep 2019, In : American Naturalist. 194, 3

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Local mate competition modifies the costs of mating in a mostly monandrous parasitoid wasp

    Boulton, R. A., Cook, N., Greenway, E. V., Glaser, G. L., Green, J. & Shuker, D. M., 5 Apr 2019, In : Behavioral Ecology. 30, 2, p. 417-425 9 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. The fitness effects of a pale mutant in the aposematic seed bug Lygaeus simulans indicate pleiotropy between warning coloration and life history

    Balfour, V. L., Aumont, C., Dougherty, L. R. & Shuker, D. M., Dec 2018, In : Ecology and Evolution. 8, 24, p. 12855-12866 12 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. An inconvenient truth: the unconsidered benefits of convenience polyandry

    Boulton, R. A., Zuk, M. & Shuker, D. M., Dec 2018, In : Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 33, 12, 12 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. Divergence is not speciation, or why we need females: a comment on Tinghitella et al

    Burdfield-Steel, E. R. & Shuker, D. M., 3 Jul 2018, In : Behavioral Ecology. 29, 4, p. 801

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Excellence in university assessment: learning from award-winning practice, by David Carless, London, Routledge

    Carver, M. & Wilder, K., 25 May 2017, In : Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 43, 2, p. 339-340

    Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article review

  2. Assessment for learning in higher education, by Kay Sambell, Liz McDowell and Catherine Montgomery, London, Routledge

    Bloxham, S. & Carver, M., 2014, In : Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 39, 1, p. 123-126 4 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article review

ID: 2086761

Top