Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Religious naturalism: the current debate

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

DOI

Author(s)

School/Research organisations

Abstract

This paper provides a survey of contemporary religious naturalism. It presents reductive and non‐reductive versions of religious naturalism, and some arguments in favour of this naturalistic perspective. Finally, it discusses three crucial demarcation issues that contemporary religious naturalism faces.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere12510
JournalPhilosophy Compass
Volume13
Issue number8
Early online date28 May 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Aug 2018

    Research areas

  • Religious naturalism

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. The blurred line between theistic evolution and intelligent design

    Leidenhag, M., 13 Nov 2019, In : Zygon. 54, 4, p. 909-931

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Framing Christian eschatology through natural teleology? Theological possibilities and concerns

    Leidenhag, M., 6 Jun 2019, In : Heythrop Journal. Early View, 13 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. The mysterianism of Owen Flanagan's normative mind science

    Leidenhag, M., 12 Feb 2018, In : Zygon. 53, 1, p. 29-48

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Philosophy and liturgy part 1: liturgy and philosophy of action

    Cockayne, J., 6 Aug 2018, In : Philosophy Compass. Early View, e12547.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Philosophy and liturgy part 2: liturgy and epistemology

    Cockayne, J., 6 Aug 2018, In : Philosophy Compass. Early View, e12522.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Beyond theism and atheism: axiarchism and ananthropocentric purposivism

    Mulgan, T., Jun 2017, In : Philosophy Compass. 12, 6, e12420.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Contrastivism about reasons and ought

    Snedegar, J., 4 Jun 2015, In : Philosophy Compass. 10, 6, p. 379-388

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 266485455

Top