Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: a call to action for psychological science

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

DOI

Open Access permissions

Open

Author(s)

Daryl B. O'Connor, John P. Aggleton, Bhismadev Chakrabarti, Cary L. Cooper, Cathy Creswell, Sandra Dunsmuir, Susan T. Fiske, Susan Gathercole, Brendan Gough, Jane L. Ireland, Marc V. Jones, Adam Jowett, Carolyn Kagan, Maria Karanika-Murray, Linda K. Kaye, Veena Kumari, Stephan Lewandowsky, Stafford Lightman, Debra Malpass, Elizabeth Meins & 9 more B. Paul Morgan, Lisa J. Morrison Coulthard, Stephen D. Reicher, Daniel L. Schacter, Susan M. Sherman, Victoria Simms, Antony Williams, Til Wykes, Christopher J. Armitage

School/Research organisations

Abstract

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) that has caused the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic represents the greatest international biopsychosocial emergency the world has faced for a century, and psychological science has an integral role to offer in helping societies recover. The aim of this paper is to set out the shorter- and longer-term priorities for research in psychological science that will (a) frame the breadth and scope of potential contributions from across the discipline; (b) enable researchers to focus their resources on gaps in knowledge; and (c) help funders and policymakers make informed decisions about future research priorities in order to best meet the needs of societies as they emerge from the acute phase of the pandemic. The research priorities were informed by an expert panel convened by the British Psychological Society that reflects the breadth of the discipline; a wider advisory panel with international input; and a survey of 539 psychological scientists conducted early in May 2020. The most pressing need is to research the negative biopsychosocial impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic to facilitate immediate and longer-term recovery, not only in relation to mental health, but also in relation to behaviour change and adherence, work, education, children and families, physical health and the brain, and social cohesion and connectedness. We call on psychological scientists to work collaboratively with other scientists and stakeholders, establish consortia, and develop innovative research methods while maintaining high-quality, open, and rigorous research standards.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere12468
JournalBritish Journal of Psychology
VolumeEarl View
Early online date19 Jul 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 19 Jul 2020

    Research areas

  • Behaviour change, Children, COVID-19, Education, Families, Health, Human development, Mental health, Neuroscience, Pandemic, Psychological science, Psychology, School, Stress, Trauma, Work function

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Mass infection is not an option: we must do more to protect our young

    Gurdasani, D., Drury, J., Greenhalgh, T., Griffin, S., Haque, Z., Hyde, Z., Katzourakis, A., McKee, M., Michie, S., Pagel, C., Reicher, S., Roberts, A., West, R., Yates, C. & Ziauddeen, H., 7 Jul 2021, (E-pub ahead of print) In: The Lancet. In Press

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

  2. Human behaviour: what scientists have learned about it from the pandemic

    Reicher, S. D., 1 Jul 2021, The Conversation.

    Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

  3. Re-opening live events and large venues after Covid-19 ‘lockdown’: behavioural risks and their mitigations

    Drury, J., Rogers, M. B., Marteau, T. M., Yardley, L., Reicher, S. & Stott, C., Jul 2021, In: Safety Science. 139, 105243.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

  4. A trouble shared is a trouble halved: the role of family identification and identification with humankind in well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic

    Frenzel, S. B., Junker, N. M., Avanzi, L., Bolatov, A., Haslam, S. A., Häusser, J. A., Kark, R., Meyer, I., Mojzisch, A., Monzani, L., Reicher, S., Samekin, A., Schury, V. A., Steffens, N. K., Sultanova, L., Van Dijk, D., van Zyl, L. E. & Van Dick, R., 16 Jun 2021, (E-pub ahead of print) In: British Journal of Social Psychology. Early View, 28 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. Misperceptions of opposite-sex preferences for thinness and muscularity

    Perrett, D. I. & Lei, X., Feb 2021, In: British Journal of Psychology. 112, 1, p. 247-264 18 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Sex differences in confidence influence patterns of conformity

    Cross, C. P., Brown, G. R., Morgan, T. J. H. & Laland, K. N., Nov 2017, In: British Journal of Psychology. 108, 4, p. 655-667

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Serial killers, spiders and cybersex: social and survival information bias in the transmission of urban legends

    Stubbersfield, J. M., Tehrani, J. J. & Flynn, E. G., May 2015, In: British Journal of Psychology. 106, 2, p. 288-307 20 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Men's strategic preferences for femininity in female faces

    Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Feinberg, D. R. & Perrett, D. I., Aug 2014, In: British Journal of Psychology. 105, 3, p. 364-381

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

ID: 269226269

Top