Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Rethinking the nature of cruelty: the role of identity leadership in the Stanford Prison Experiment

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle


Open Access permissions



The Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) is one of the most famous studies in the history of psychology. For nearly a half century it has been understood to show that assigning people to a toxic role will, on its own, unlock the human capacity to treat others with cruelty. In contrast, principles of identity leadership argue that roles are unlikely to elicit cruelty unless leaders encourage potential perpetrators to identify with what is presented as a noble ingroup cause and to believe their actions are necessary for the advancement of that cause. Although identity leadership has been implicated in behavior ranging from electoral success to obedience to authority, researchers have hitherto had limited capacity to establish whether role conformity or identity leadership provides a better account of the cruelty observed in the SPE. Through examination of material in the SPE archive, we present comprehensive evidence that, rather than guards conforming to role of their own accord, experimenters directly encouraged them to adopt roles and act tough in a manner consistent with tenets of identity leadership. Implications for the analysis of conformity and cruelty as well as for interpretation of the SPE are discussed.


Original languageEnglish
JournalAmerican Psychologist
VolumeOnline First
Early online date5 Aug 2019
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 5 Aug 2019

    Research areas

  • Leadership, Followership, Social identitfication, Identity entrepreneurship, Standford Prison Experiment

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. A social identity model of riot diffusion: from injustice to empowerment in the 2011 London riots

    Drury, J., Stott, C., Ball, R., Reicher, S. D., Neville, F. G., Bell, L., Biddlestone, M., Choudhury, S., Lovell, M. & Ryan, C. E., 9 Jan 2020, In : European Journal of Social Psychology. Early View

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Multiple perspectives in conflict settings: an introduction

    Elcheroth, G., Penic, S., Usoof, R. & Reicher, S., 18 Dec 2019, In : Journal of Social and Political Psychology. 7, 2, p. 913-924

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Who controls the city? A micro-historical case study of the spread of rioting across North London in August 2011

    Ball, R., Stott, C., Drury, J., Neville, F. G., Reicher, S. D. & Choudhury, S., 12 Nov 2019, In : City. Latest articles

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Social relations in crowds: recognition, validation and solidarity

    Hopkins, N., Reicher, S., Stevenson, C., Pandey, K., Shankar, S. & Tewari, S., 5 Jun 2019, In : European Journal of Social Psychology. Early View

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 261371651