Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Revision total knee replacement versus primary total knee replacement: a matched cohort study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Paul Stirling, Scott Middleton, Ivan Brenkel, Phil Walmsley

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Introduction

The primary aim of this study was to describe a baseline comparison of early knee-specific functional outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using metaphyseal sleeves with a matched cohort of patients undergoing primary TKA. The secondary aim was to compare incidence of complications and length of stay (LOS) between the two groups.

Methods

Patients undergoing revision TKA for all diagnoses between 2009 and 2016 had patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) collected prospectively. PROMs consisted of the American Knee Society Score (AKSS) and Short-Form 12 (SF-12). The study cohort was identified retrospectively and demographics were collected. The cohort was matched to a control group of patients undergoing primary TKA.

Results

Overall, 72 patients underwent revision TKA and were matched with 72 primary TKAs with a mean follow-up of 57 months (standard deviation (SD) 20 months). The only significant difference in postoperative PROMs was a worse AKSS pain score in the revision group (36 vs 44, p = 0.002); however, these patients still produced an improvement in the pain score. There was no significant difference in improvement of AKSS or SF-12 between the two groups. LOS (9.3 days vs 4.6 days) and operation time (1 hour 56 minutes vs 1 hour 7 minutes) were significantly higher in the revision group (p < 0.001). Patients undergoing revision were significantly more likely to require intraoperative lateral release and postoperative urinary catheterisation (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This matched-cohort study provides results of revision TKA using modern techniques and implants and outlines what results patients can expect to achieve using primary TKA as a control. This should be useful to clinicians counselling patients for revision TKA.

Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-34
JournalBone & Joint Open
Volume1
Issue number3
Early online date13 Mar 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 13 Mar 2020

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Results of using a "2-in-1" single-stage revision total knee arthroplasty for infection with associated boneloss: prospective 2-Year follow-up

    Holland, G., Brown, G., Goudie, S., Brenkel, I. & Walmsley, P., 30 Sep 2019, In : The Journal of Knee Surgery. eFirst

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. The South African take on the America–British–Canadian Fellowship

    Held, M., Walmsley, P., Baker, P., Arul, R., Sandiford, A., Johnson, L. & Rosenfeldt, M., 31 May 2019, In : South African Orthopaedic Journal . 18, 2, p. 17-19 3 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

  3. Ten-year results of the Press Fit Condylar sigma Cobalt-Chrome total knee replacement

    Keenan, O., Brenkel, I. & Walmsley, P., Mar 2019, In : The Journal of Knee Surgery. 32, 3, p. 222-226 5 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. How do I select the right clinical teaching fellowship?

    Rimmer, A., Walmsley, P., Nassrally, S. & Anyiam, O., 16 Feb 2019, In : British Medical Journal. 364, i697, p. 293

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. Press fit condylar cobalt chrome sigma total knee arthroplasty: no difference to original design at five year point

    Wood, A. M., Heil, K. M., Brenkel, I. J. & Walmsley, P., Apr 2018, In : Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery. 5, 1, p. 15-18

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 266539947

Top