Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Search and foraging behaviors from movement data: a comparison of methods

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

DOI

Open Access permissions

Open

Author(s)

Ashley Bennison, Stuart Bearhop, Thomas W. Bodey, Stephen C. Votier, W. James Grecian, Ewan D. Wakefield, Keith C. Hamer, Mark Jessopp

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Search behavior is often used as a proxy for foraging effort within studies of animal movement, despite it being only one part of the foraging process, which also includes prey capture. While methods for validating prey capture exist, many studies rely solely on behavioral annotation of animal movement data to identify search and infer prey capture attempts. However, the degree to which search correlates with prey capture is largely untested. This study applied seven behavioral annotation methods to identify search behavior from GPS tracks of northern gannets (Morus bassanus), and compared outputs to the occurrence of dives recorded by simultaneously deployed time-depth recorders. We tested how behavioral annotation methods vary in their ability to identify search behavior leading to dive events. There was considerable variation in the number of dives occurring within search areas across methods. Hidden Markov models proved to be the most successful, with 81% of all dives occurring within areas identified as search. k-Means clustering and first passage time had the highest rates of dives occurring outside identified search behavior. First passage time and hidden Markov models had the lowest rates of false positives, identifying fewer search areas with no dives. All behavioral annotation methods had advantages and drawbacks in terms of the complexity of analysis and ability to reflect prey capture events while minimizing the number of false positives and false negatives. We used these results, with consideration of analytical difficulty, to provide advice on the most appropriate methods for use where prey capture behavior is not available. This study highlights a need to critically assess and carefully choose a behavioral annotation method suitable for the research question being addressed, or resulting species management frameworks established.

Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13-24
Number of pages12
JournalEcology and Evolution
Volume8
Issue number1
Early online date23 Nov 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2018

    Research areas

  • Behavior, First passage time, Hidden Markov models, k-means, Kernel density, Machine learning, Movement, State-space models, Telemetry

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Marine protected areas show low overlap with projected distributions of seabird populations in Britain and Ireland

    Critchley, E. J., Grecian, W. J., Kane, A., Jessopp, M. J. & Quinn, J. L., Aug 2018, In : Biological Conservation. 224, p. 309-317 9 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Understanding the ontogeny of foraging behaviour: insights from combining marine predator bio-logging with satellite-derived oceanography in hidden Markov models

    Grecian, W. J., Lane, J., Michelot, T., Wade, H. M. & Hamer, K. C., 6 Jun 2018, In : Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 15, 143, 9 p., 20180084.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Man-made structures and Apex Predators: Spatial interactions and overlap (MAPS)

    Grecian, W. J., Masden, E. A., Hammond, P. S., Owen, E., Daunt, F., Wanless, S. & Russell, D. JF., Jan 2018, INSITE.

    Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned report

  4. Effects of age and reproductive status on individual foraging site fidelity in a long-lived marine predator

    Votier, S. C., Fayet, A. L., Bearhop, S., Bodey, T. W., Clark, B. L., Grecian, J., Guilford, T., Hamer, K. C., Jeglinski, J. W. E., Morgan, G., Wakefield, E. & Patrick, S. C., 26 Jul 2017, In : Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 284, 1859, 7 p., 20171068.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. Too close and too far: quantifying black rhino displacement and location error during research

    Plotz, R. D., Grecian, W. J., Kerley, G. I. H. & Linklater, W. L., 1 Apr 2017, In : African Journal of Wildlife Research. 47, 1, p. 47-58 12 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Accounting for preferential sampling in species distribution models

    Pennino, M. G., Paradinas, I., Illian, J. B., Muñoz, F., Bellido, J. M., López-Quílez, A. & Conesa, D., 1 Jan 2019, In : Ecology and Evolution. 9, 1, p. 653-663 11 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Decline in abundance and apparent survival rates of fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus) in the northern Gulf of St. Lawrence

    Schleimer, A., Ramp, C., Delarue, J., Carpentier, A., Bérubé, M., Palsbøl, P. J., Sears, R. & Hammond, P. S., Apr 2019, In : Ecology and Evolution. 9, 7, p. 4231-4244 14 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Long-term sound and movement recording tags to study natural behavior and reaction to ship noise of seals

    Mikkelsen, L., Johnson, M., Wisniewska, D. M., van Neer, A., Siebert, U., Madsen, P. T. & Teilmann, J., 6 Feb 2019, In : Ecology and Evolution. Early View, 14 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Repeat disturbances have cumulative impacts on stream communities

    Haghkerdar, J. M., McLachlan, J. R., Ireland, A. & Greig, H. S., 14 Feb 2019, In : Ecology and Evolution. Early View, 9 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. Social effects on fruit fly courtship song

    Marie-Orleach, L., Bailey, N. W. & Ritchie, M. G., Jan 2019, In : Ecology and Evolution. 9, 1, p. 410-416 7 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Ecology and Evolution (Journal)

    Will Cresswell (Reviewer)
    28 Sep 2017

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesPeer review of manuscripts

  2. Ecology and Evolution (Journal)

    Nora Nell Hanson (Reviewer)
    2016

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesPeer review of manuscripts

  3. Ecology and Evolution (Journal)

    David Michael Shuker (Member of editorial board)
    2011

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

ID: 251712555