Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Self-help for learned journals: scientific societies and the commerce of publishing in the 1950s

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


In the decades after the Second World War, learned society publishers struggled to cope with the expanding output of scientific research and the increased involvement of commercial publishers in the business of publishing research journals. Could learned society journals survive economically in the postwar world, against this competition? Or was the emergence of a sales-based commercial model of publishing – in contrast to the traditional model of subsidized journal publishing – an opportunity to transform the often-fragile finances of learned societies? But there was also an existential threat: if commercial firms could successfully publish scientific journals, were learned society publishers no longer needed? This paper investigates how British learned society publishers adjusted to the new economic realities of the postwar world, through an investigation of the activities organized by the Royal Society of London and the Nuffield Foundation, culminating in the 1963 report Self-Help for Learned Journals. It reveals the postwar decades as the time when scientific research became something to be commodified and sold to libraries, rather than circulated as part of a scholarly mission. It will be essential reading for all those campaigning to transition academic publishing – including learned society publishing – away from the sales-based model once again


Original languageEnglish
Number of pages25
JournalHistory of Science
VolumeOnline First
Early online date18 Mar 2021
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 18 Mar 2021

    Research areas

  • Academic publishing, Scientific journals, Twentieth-century Britain, Commercialization, Open access, Scientific societies, Scholarly communication

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. The Royal Society and the noncommercial circulation of knowledge

    Fyfe, A., 21 Oct 2020, Reassembling Scholarly Communications: Histories, Infrastructures, and Global Politics of Open Access. Eve, M. P. & Gray, J. (eds.). MIT Press, p. 147-160

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

  2. The production, circulation, consumption and ownership of scientific knowledge: historical perspectives

    Fyfe, A., 6 Sep 2020, Glasgow: CREATe (UK Copyright and Creative Economy Centre, University of Glasgow), (CREATe Working Papers).

    Research output: Working paper

  3. Managing the growth of peer review at the Royal Society journals, 1865-1965

    Fyfe, A., Squazzoni, F., Torny, D. & Dondio, P., 1 May 2020, In: Science, Technology, and Human Values. 45, 3, p. 405-429 25 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Special Issue:Editorship and the Editing of Scientific Journals, 1750–1950

    Fyfe, A. (ed.) & Gielas, A. M. (ed.), Feb 2020, In: Centaurus. 62, 1

    Research output: Contribution to journalSpecial issuepeer-review

  5. Introduction: Editorship and the editing of scientific journals, 1750-1950

    Fyfe, A. & Gielas, A. M., 2020, In: Centaurus. 62, 1, p. 5-20 16 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. Phases of physics in J.D. Forbes’ Dissertation Sixth for the Encyclopaedia Britannica (1856)

    Falconer, I. J., 3 Dec 2018, (E-pub ahead of print) In: History of Science. OnlineFirst, 26 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Reputation in a box. Objects, communication and trust in late 18th-century botanical networks

    Easterby-Smith, S., 1 Jun 2015, In: History of Science. 53, 2, p. 180-208

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Green treasures and paper floras: The business of Mutis in New Granada (1783-1808)

    Marcaida, J. R. & Pimentel, J., 1 Sep 2014, In: History of Science. 52, 3, p. 277-296 20 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

ID: 272862667