Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Sex and pairing status impact how zebra finches use social information in foraging

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Many factors, including the demonstrator’s sex, status, and familiarity, shape the nature and magnitude of social learning. Given the important role of pair bonds in socially-monogamous animals, we predicted that these intimate relationships would promote the use of social information, and tested this hypothesis in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Observer birds witnessed either their mate or another familiar, opposite-sex bird eat from one, but not a second novel food source, before being allowed to feed from both food sources themselves. Birds used social information to make foraging decisions, but not all individuals used this information in the same way. While most individuals copied the foraging choice of the demonstrator as predicted, paired males did not, instead avoiding the feeder demonstrated by their mate. Our findings reveal that sex and pairing status interact to influence the use of social information and suggest that paired males might use social information to avoid competing with their mate.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)38-42
Number of pages5
JournalBehavioural Processes
Volume139
Early online date21 Dec 2016
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2017
Scopus citations0

    Research areas

  • Monogamy, Pair-bond, Social information, Social learning

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Does song complexity correlate with problem-solving performance in flocks of zebra finches?

    Templeton, C. N., Laland, K. N. & Boogert, N. J. Jun 2014 In : Animal Behaviour. 92, p. 63-71 9 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. The extension of biology through culture

    Whiten, A., Ayala, F., Feldman, M. W. & Laland, K. N. 24 Jul 2017 In : Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Early Edition, 7 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Hoo are you? Tits do not respond to novel predators as threats

    Carlson, N. V., Healy, S. D. & Templeton, C. N. Jun 2017 In : Animal Behaviour. 128, p. 79-84 6 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Extended spider cognition

    Japyassú, H. F. & Laland, K. N. May 2017 In : Animal Cognition. 20, 3, p. 375-395 21 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Related by journal

  1. Wild hummingbirds can use the geometry of a flower array

    Hornsby, M. A. W., Healy, S. D. & Hurly, T. A. Jun 2017 In : Behavioural Processes. 139, p. 33-37 5 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Fast- and slow-exploring pigeons differ in how they use previously learned rules

    Guillette, L. M., Baron, D. M., Sturdy, C. B. & Spetch, M. L. Jan 2017 In : Behavioural Processes. 134, p. 54-62 9 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Behavioural Processes (Journal)

    Healy, S. D. (Editor)
    1 Sep 201431 Dec 2014

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial workEditor of research journal

  2. Behavioural Processes (Journal)

    Healy, S. D. (Member of editorial board)
    2010 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial workEditor of research journal

ID: 248483777