Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Sex differences in confidence influence patterns of conformity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

DOI

Open Access permissions

Open

Abstract

Lack of confidence in one's own ability can increase the likelihood of relying on social information. Sex differences in confidence have been extensively investigated in cognitive tasks, but implications for conformity have not been directly tested. Here, we tested the hypothesis that, in a task that shows sex differences in confidence, an indirect effect of sex on social information use will also be evident. Participants (N = 168) were administered a mental rotation (MR) task or a letter transformation (LT) task. After providing an answer, participants reported their confidence before seeing the responses of demonstrators and being allowed to change their initial answer. In the MR, but not the LT, task, women showed lower levels of confidence than men, and confidence mediated an indirect effect of sex on the likelihood of switching answers. These results provide novel, experimental evidence that confidence is a general explanatory mechanism underpinning susceptibility to social influences. Our results have implications for the interpretation of the wider literature on sex differences in conformity.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)655-667
JournalBritish Journal of Psychology
Volume108
Issue number4
Early online date11 Nov 2016
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2017

    Research areas

  • Gender, Social learning, Mental rotation, Letter transformation, Gender stereotype, Stereotype threat

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Evolutionary approaches to human behaviour

    Brown, G. R., Cross, C. P. & Laland, K. N. 2018 The Behaviour of Animals: Mechanisms, Function and Evolution; 2nd Edition; Ed. J. Bolhuis and L.-A. Giraldeau.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

  2. Sex differences in the use of social information emerge under conditions of risk

    Brand, C. O., Brown, G. R. & Cross, C. P. 4 Dec 2017 In : PeerJ.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. The social construction of human nature

    Laland, K. N. & Brown, G. R. 2017 Why We Disagree About Human Nature. Lewens, T. & Hannon, B. (eds.). Oxford University Press

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

  4. Evolutionary approaches to human psychology

    Brown, G. R. & Cross, C. P. 2017 APA Handbook of Comparative Psychology: Volume 1. Call, J., Burghardt, G., Pepperberg, I., Snowdon, C. & T, Z. (eds.). American Psychological Association, p. 299-313

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Related by journal

  1. Serial killers, spiders and cybersex: social and survival information bias in the transmission of urban legends

    Stubbersfield, J. M., Tehrani, J. J. & Flynn, E. G. May 2015 In : British Journal of Psychology. 106, 2, p. 288-307 20 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Men's strategic preferences for femininity in female faces

    Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Feinberg, D. R. & Perrett, D. I. Aug 2014 In : British Journal of Psychology. 105, 3, p. 364-381

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Changes in the relationship between self-reference and emotional valence as a function of dysphoria.

    Watson, L., Dritschel, B., Jentzsch, I. & Obonsawin, M. Feb 2008 In : British Journal of Psychology. 99, p. 143-152 10 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 246781015