Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Sex differences in impulsivity: a meta-analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

DOI

Open Access permissions

Open

Abstract

Men are overrepresented in socially problematic behaviors, such as aggression and criminal behavior, which have been linked to impulsivity. Our review of impulsivity is organized around the tripartite theoretical distinction between reward hypersensitivity, punishment hyposensitivity, and inadequate effortful control. Drawing on evolution try, criminological, developmental, and personality theories, we predicted that sex differences would be most pronounced in risky activities with men demonstrating greater sensation seeking, greater reward sensitivity, and lower punishment sensitivity. We predicted a small female advantage in effortful control. We analyzed 741 effect sizes from 277 studies, including psychometric and behavioral measures. Women were consistently more punishment sensitive (d = -0.33), but men did not show greater reward sensitivity (d = 0.01). Men showed significantly higher sensation seeking on questionnaire mea lures (d = 0.41) and on a behavioral risk-taking task (d = 0.36). Questionnaire measures of deficits in effortful control showed a very modest effect size in the male direction (d = 0.08). Sex differences were not found on delay discounting or executive function tasks. The results indicate a stronger sex difference in motivational rather than effortful or executive forms of behavior control. Specifically, they support evolutionary and biological theories of risk taking predicated on sex differences in punishment sensitivity. A clearer understanding of sex differences in impulsivity depends upon recognizing important distinctions between sensation seeking and impulsivity, between executive and effortful forms of control, and between impulsivity as a deficit and as a trait.

Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-130
Number of pages34
JournalPsychological Bulletin
Volume137
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011

    Research areas

  • Impulsivity, Sex, Sensation seeking, Effortful control, Reinforcement sensitivity, Risk-task bart, Gender-differences, Self-control, Personality-traits, Decision-making, General-theory, Behavioral activation, Construct-validity

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Sex differences in confidence influence patterns of conformity

    Cross, C. P., Brown, G. R., Morgan, T. J. H. & Laland, K. N. 11 Nov 2016 In : British Journal of Psychology. 108, 4, p. 655-667

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Father absence and gendered traits in sons and daughters

    Boothroyd, L. G. & Cross, C. P. 5 Jul 2017 In : PLoS One. 12, 7, 19 p., e0179954

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Integrating approaches requires more than a division of labour: commentary on Wӧlfer & Hewstone

    Cross, C. P. & Campbell, A. Feb 2017 In : Psychological Science. 28, 2, p. 248-250

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

  4. Evolutionary approaches to human behaviour

    Brown, G. R., Cross, C. P. & Laland, K. N. 2017 The Behaviour of Animals: Mechanisms, Function and Evolution; 2nd Edition; Ed. J. Bolhuis and L.-A. Giraldeau.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

  5. Evolutionary approaches to human psychology

    Brown, G. R. & Cross, C. P. 2017 APA Handbook of Comparative Psychology: Volume 1. Call, J., Burghardt, G., Pepperberg, I., Snowdon, C. & T, Z. (eds.). American Psychological Association, p. 299-313

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Related by journal

  1. Integrating the Study of Conformity and Culture in Humans and Nonhuman Animals

    Claidiere, N. & Whiten, A. Jan 2012 In : Psychological Bulletin. 138, 1, p. 126-145 20 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Mental evolution and development: Evidence for secondary representation in children, great apes and other animals

    Suddendorf, T. & Whiten, A. Sep 2001 In : Psychological Bulletin. 127, 5, p. 629-650 22 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 16144506