Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Sex differences in sensation-seeking: a meta-analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

DOI

Open Access permissions

Open

Abstract

Men score higher than women on measures of sensation-seeking, defined as a willingness to engage in novel or intense activities. This sex difference has been explained in terms of evolved psychological mechanisms or culturally transmitted social norms. We investigated whether sex differences in sensation-seeking have changed over recent years by conducting a meta-analysis of studies using Zuckerman's Sensation Seeking Scale, version V (SSS-V). We found that sex differences in total SSS-V scores have remained stable across years, as have sex differences in Disinhibition and Boredom Susceptibility. In contrast, the sex difference in Thrill and Adventure Seeking has declined, possibly due to changes in social norms or out-dated questions on this sub-scale. Our results support the view that men and women differ in their propensity to report sensation-seeking characteristics, while behavioural manifestations of sensation-seeking vary over time. Sex differences in sensation-seeking could reflect genetically influenced predispositions interacting with socially transmitted information.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number2486
JournalScientific Reports
Volume3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Aug 2013

    Research areas

  • Evolutionary developmental biology, Motivation, Psychology, Addiction

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Human mate-choice copying is domain-general social learning

    Street, S. E., Morgan, T. J. H., Thornton, A., Brown, G. R., Laland, K. N. & Cross, C. P., 29 Jan 2018, In : Scientific Reports. 8, 1715.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Sex differences in the use of social information emerge under conditions of risk

    Brand, C. O., Brown, G. R. & Cross, C. P., 3 Jan 2018, In : PeerJ. 6, 18 p., e4190.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Sex differences in confidence influence patterns of conformity

    Cross, C. P., Brown, G. R., Morgan, T. J. H. & Laland, K. N., Nov 2017, In : British Journal of Psychology. 108, 4, p. 655-667

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Evolutionary approaches to human psychology

    Brown, G. R. & Cross, C. P., 2017, APA Handbook of Comparative Psychology: Volume 1. Call, J., Burghardt, G., Pepperberg, I., Snowdon, C. & T, Z. (eds.). American Psychological Association, p. 299-313

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Related by journal

  1. A comparative analysis of response times shows that multisensory benefits and interactions are not equivalent

    Innes, B. R. & Otto, T. U., 27 Feb 2019, In : Scientific Reports. 9, 10 p., 2921.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. A large explosive silicic eruption in the British Palaeogene Igneous Province

    Troll, V. R., Emeleus, C. H., Nicoll, G. R., Mattsson, T., Ellam, R. M., Donaldson, C. H. & Harris, C., 24 Jan 2019, In : Scientific Reports. 9, 1, 15 p., 494.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Defining the genes for the final steps in biosynthesis of the complex polyketide antibiotic mupirocin by Pseudomonas fluorescens NCIMB10586

    Connolly, J. A., Wilson, A., Macioszek, M., Song, Z., Wang, L., Mohammad, H. H., Yadav, M., di Martino, M., Miller, C. E., Hothersall, J., Haines, A. S., Stephens, E. R., Crump, M. P., Willis, C. L., Simpson, T. J., Winn, P. J. & Thomas, C. M., 7 Feb 2019, In : Scientific Reports. 9, 9 p., 1542.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Quantum-dot micropillar lasers subject to coherent time-delayed optical feedback from a short external cavity

    Holzinger, S., Schneider, C., Höfling, S., Porte, X. & Reitzenstein, S., 24 Jan 2019, In : Scientific Reports. 9, 8 p., 631.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Scientific Reports (Journal)

    Monica Arso Civil (Reviewer)
    Jul 2018 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesPeer review of manuscripts

  2. Scientific Reports (Journal)

    Anouk Margaretha Borst (Reviewer)
    10 Feb 2017

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesPeer review of manuscripts

  3. Scientific Reports (Journal)

    Emma Louise Carroll (Member of editorial board)
    3 Oct 2016

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

  4. Scientific Reports (Journal)

    Uli Schwarz-Linek (Reviewer)
    11 May 2016

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesPeer review of manuscripts

  5. Scientific Reports (Journal)

    Ildiko Maureen Lara Somorjai (Reviewer)
    2016 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesPeer review of manuscripts

ID: 65305720