Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Sexy sons and sexy daughters: the influence of parents' facial characteristics on offspring

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

DOI

Author(s)

R. Elisabeth Cornwell, David I. Perrett

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Choosing a mate to maximize fitness underlies all sexual selection theories. Key to understanding mate choice is the inheritance of particular traits. Using family photos, we evaluated the predictions made by sexual selection theories for human mate choice concerning the inheritance of facial characteristics and assortment in facial appearance of parents. We found that both fathers' and mothers' attractiveness predicted the facial attractiveness of daughters: 'sexy daughters'. Fathers and sons were related to each other in facial masculinity but not attractiveness, providing only partial evidence for 'sexy sons'. Mothers and sons did not relate in masculinity-femininity; neither did fathers and daughters. Parents were similar in attractiveness but masculine men were not partnered to feminine women. Our findings support some predictions of Fisherian selection processes and 'good genes' theory but are less consistent with 'correlated response theory' and the immunocompetence handicap principle. (C) 2008 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1843-1853
Number of pages11
JournalAnimal Behaviour
Volume76
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2008

    Research areas

  • attractiveness, masculinity, parent, offspring, sexual selection, MALE MATE CHOICE, IMMUNOCOMPETENCE HANDICAP HYPOTHESIS, FEMALE NORTHERN CARDINALS, SEXUAL-DIMORPHISM, FLUCTUATING ASYMMETRY, EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY, SALIVARY TESTOSTERONE, COLORFUL FEMALES, APPARENT HEALTH, MENSTRUAL-CYCLE

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Familiarity with own population's appearance influences facial preferences

    Batres, C., Kannan, M. & Perrett, D. I. Sep 2017 In : Human Nature. 28, 3, p. 344-354

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Women’s preferences for men’s facial masculinity: trade-off accounts revisited

    Holzleitner, I. J. & Perrett, D. I. 12 Aug 2017 In : Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology. In press

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Aggressor or protector? Experiences and perceptions of violence predict preferences for masculinity

    Borras Guevara, M. L., Batres, C. & Perrett, D. I. Jul 2017 In : Evolution and Human Behavior. 38, 4, p. 481-489 9 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Emotion-color associations in the context of the face

    Thorstenson, C. A., Elliot, A. J., Pazda, A. D., Perrett, D. I. & Xiao, D. 21 Jun 2017 In : Emotion. In press

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. Facial redness increases men’s perceived healthiness and attractiveness

    Thorstenson, C. A., Pazda, A. D., Elliot, A. J. & Perrett, D. I. 1 Jun 2017 In : Perception. 46, 6, p. 650-664

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Mate choice intensifies motor signalling in Drosophila

    Debelle, A., Courtiol, A., Ritchie, M. G. & Snook, R. R. 14 Oct 2017 In : Animal Behaviour. 133, p. 169-187 19 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Vervet monkeys greet adult males during high-risk situations

    Mercier, S., Neumann, C., van de Waal, E., Chollet, E., de Bellefon, J. M. & Zuberbuhler, K. Oct 2017 In : Animal Behaviour. 132, p. 229-245

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Divergent mechanisms of acoustic mate recognition between closely related field cricket species (Teleogryllus spp.)

    Bailey, N. W., Moran, P. & Hennig, R. M. Aug 2017 In : Animal Behaviour. 130, p. 17-25

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Can females choose to avoid mating failure in the seed bug Lygaeus simulans?

    Greenway, E. V. . G., Balfour, V. L. & Shuker, D. M. Jul 2017 In : Animal Behaviour. 129, p. 61-69 9 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. Hoo are you? Tits do not respond to novel predators as threats

    Carlson, N. V., Healy, S. D. & Templeton, C. N. Jun 2017 In : Animal Behaviour. 128, p. 79-84 6 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Animal Behaviour (Journal)

    Webster, M. M. (Editor)
    1 Jan 201731 Dec 2019

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial workEditor of research journal

  2. Animal Behaviour (Journal)

    Healy, S. D. (Editor)
    1 Jun 201631 May 2020

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial workEditor of research journal

  3. Animal Behaviour (Journal)

    Alfredo Fernandez Ojanguren (Member of editorial board)
    15 May 201312 Feb 2015

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial workPeer review of manuscripts

  4. Animal Behaviour (Journal)

    Thomas Bugnyar (Editor)
    20082011

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial workEditor of research journal

  5. Animal Behaviour (Journal)

    Rachel Louise Kendal (Editor)
    2007 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial workEditor of research journal

ID: 596193