Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Spectrum arguments and hypersensitivity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Author(s)

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Larry Temkin famously argues that what he calls spectrum arguments yield strong reason to reject Transitivity, according to which the ‘all-things-considered better than’ relation is transitive. Spectrum arguments do reveal that the conjunctions of independently plausible claims are inconsistent with Transitivity. But I argue that there is very strong independent reason to reject such conjunctions of claims, and thus that the fact that they are inconsistent with Transitivity does not yield strong reason to reject Transitivity.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1729-1744
JournalPhilosophical Studies
Volume175
Issue number7
Early online date25 May 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2018

    Research areas

  • Spectrum arguments, Sorites arguments, Transitivity, Hypersensitivity, Temkin

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Effective justice

    Crisp, R. & Pummer, T. G., 13 Aug 2020, In: Journal of Moral Philosophy. 17, 4, p. 398-415

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Review of The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity

    Pummer, T. G., 2 Aug 2020, In: Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.

    Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article reviewpeer-review

  3. Effective altruism

    MacAskill, W. & Pummer, T. G., 15 Jun 2020, The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. LaFollette, H. (ed.). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingEntry for encyclopedia/dictionary

  4. Rescue and personal involvement: a response to Woollard

    Pummer, T. G. & Crisp, R., 16 Sep 2019, In: Analysis. Advance articles, anz052.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  5. The ethics of giving: philosophers’ perspectives on philanthropy

    Pummer, T. G., 19 Jul 2019, In: Philosophical Quarterly. In press, pqz032.

    Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article review

Related by journal

  1. Normative metaphysics for accountants

    Maguire, B. & Snedegar, J., 22 Feb 2020, In: Philosophical Studies. First Online, 22 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Conspiracy Theories, Impostor Syndrome, and Distrust

    Hawley, K. J., 2 Jan 2019, In: Philosophical Studies. First online, 12 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Epistemically blameworthy belief

    Brown, J. A., 14 Dec 2019, In: Philosophical Studies. First Online, 20 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Epistemology and the law: why there is no epistemic mileage in legal cases

    Backes, M., 5 Sep 2019, In: Philosophical Studies. First Online, 20 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  5. Minimal disturbance: in defence of pragmatic reasons of the right kind

    Bastian, L., 9 Dec 2019, In: Philosophical Studies. First Online, 22 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

ID: 249984481

Top