Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Techniques for estimating the size of low-density gopher tortoise populations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus) are candidates for range-wide listing as threatened under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Reliable population estimates are important to inform policy and management for recovery of the species. Line transect distance sampling has been adopted as the preferred method to estimate population size. However, when tortoise density is low, it can be challenging to obtain enough tortoise observations to reliably estimate the probability of detection, a vital component of the method. We suggest a modification to the method based on counting usable tortoise burrows (more abundant than tortoises) and separately accounting for the proportion of burrows occupied by tortoises. The increased sample size of burrows can outweigh the additional uncertainty induced by the need to account for the proportion of burrows occupied. We demonstrate the method using surveys conducted within a 13,118-ha portion of the Gopher Tortoise Habitat Management Unit at Fort Gordon Army Installation, Georgia. We used a systematic random design to obtain more precise estimates, using a newly developed systematic variance estimator. Individual transects had a spatially efficient design (pseudocircuits), which greatly improved sampling efficiency on this large site. Estimated burrow density was 0.091 ± 0.011 burrows/ha (CV = 12.6%, 95% CI = 0.071–0.116), with 25% of burrows occupied by a tortoise (CV = 14.4%), yielding a tortoise density of 0.023 ± 0.004 tortoise/ha (CV = 19.0%, 95% CI = 0.016–0.033) and a population estimate of 297 tortoises (95% CI = 210–433). These techniques are applicable to other studies and species. Surveying burrows or nests, rather than animals, can produce more reliable estimates when it leads to a significantly larger sample of detections and when the occupancy status can reliably be ascertained. Systematic line transect survey designs give better precision and are practical to implement and analyze.



Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)377-386
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Fish and Wildlife Management
Issue number2
Early online date1 Jun 2017
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2017

    Research areas

  • Abundance, Burrows, Cluster size analysis, Gopher tortoise, Line transect distance sampling, Population density, Systematic sampling

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Roaring and repetition: how bowhead whales adjust their call density and source level (Lombard effect) in the presence of natural and seismic airgun survey noise

    Thode, A. M., Blackwell, S. B., Conrad, A. S., Kim, K. H., Marques, T., Thomas, L., Oedekoven, C. S., Harris, D. & Broker, K., 31 Mar 2020, In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 147, 3, p. 2061-2080 20 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Estimating group size from acoustic footprint to improve Blainville’s beaked whale abundance estimation

    Marques, T. A., Jorge, P. A., Mouriño, H., Thomas, L., Moretti, D. J., Dolan, K., Claridge, D. & Dunn, C., 15 Dec 2019, In: Applied Acoustics . 156, p. 434-439

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Evaluating the effect of measurement error in pairs of 3D bearings in point transect sampling estimates of density

    Marques, T. A., Duarte, P., Peixe, T., Moretti, D. & Thomas, L., 27 Mar 2018, University of St Andrews. 72 p. (CREEM Technical Report; no. 2018-1)

    Research output: Book/ReportOther report

  4. Comparing methods suitable for monitoring marine mammals in low visibility conditions during seismic surveys

    Verfuss, U. K., Gillespie, D., Gordon, J., Marques, T. A., Miller, B., Plunkett, R., Theriault, J. A., Tollit, D. J., Zitterbart, D. P., Hubert, P. & Thomas, L., Jan 2018, In: Marine Pollution Bulletin. 126, p. 1-18 18 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

  5. Estimation bias under model selection for distance sampling detection functions

    Prieto Gonzalez, R., Thomas, L. & Marques, T. A., Sep 2017, In: Environmental and Ecological Statistics. 24, 3, p. 399-414 16 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

ID: 255606712