Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

The construction of feelings of justice in environmental management: an empirical study of multiple biodiversity conflicts in Calakmul, Mexico

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Lou Lecuyer, Rehema M. White, Birgit Schmook, Violaine Lemay, Sophie Calmé

School/Research organisations

Abstract

A failure to address social concerns in biodiversity conservation can lead to feelings of injustice among some actors, and hence jeopardize conservation goals. The complex socio-cultural and political context of the Calakmul Biosphere Reserve, Mexico, has historically led to multiple biodiversity conflicts. Our goal, in this case study, was to explore perceptions of justice held by local actors in relation to biodiversity conflicts. We then aimed to determine the following: 1) people's definitions of their feelings of justice; 2) the criteria used in this assessment; 3) variability in the criteria influencing them; and 4) implications for environmental management in the region and beyond. We worked with five focus groups, exploring three examples of biodiversity conflict around forest, water and jaguar management with a total of 41 ranchers, farmers and representatives of local producers. Our results demonstrated that people constructed their feelings of justice around four dimensions of justice: recognition (acknowledging individuals' rights, values, cultures and knowledge systems); ecological (fair and respectful treatment of the natural environment), procedural (fairness in processes of environmental management), distributive (fairness in the distribution of costs and benefits). We identified a list of criteria the participants used in their appraisal of justice and sources of variation such as the social scale of focus and participant role, and whom they perceived to be responsible for resource management. We propose a new framework that conceptualizes justice-as-recognition and ecological justice as forms of conditional justices, and procedural and distributive justices as forms of practical justice. Conditional justice allows us to define who is a legitimate source of justice norms and if nature should be integrated in the scope of justice; hence, conditional justice underpins other dimensions of justice. On the other hand, procedural and distributive address the daily practices of fair processes and distribution. We propose that the perception of justice is a neglected but important aspect to include in integrative approaches to managing biodiversity conflicts. Addressing demands of justice in environmental management will require us to consider more than the distribution of costs and benefits among actors. We also need to respect the plurality of fairness perspectives and to recognize the benefits of dialogical approaches to achieve more successful environmental management.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)363-373
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Environmental Management
Volume213
Early online date16 Mar 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2018

    Research areas

  • Fairness, Procedural justice, Distributive justice, Ecological justice, Recognition justice

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. A competency framework to assess and activate education for sustainable development: addressing the UN Sustainable Development Goals 4.7 Challenge

    Giangrande, N., White, R. M., East, M., Jackson, R., Clarke, T., Saloff Coste, M. & Penha-Lopes, G., 17 May 2019, In : Sustainability. 11, 10, 16 p., 2832.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Building on common ground to address biodiversity conflicts and foster collaboration in environmental management

    Lecuyer, L., White, R. M., Schmook, B. & Calmé, S., 15 Aug 2018, In : Journal of Environmental Management. 220, p. 217-226 10 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. A Learning Platform for early detection of tree pests and pathogens: excellent theory, challenging in practice?

    Marzano, M., White, R. M. & Jones, G., 31 Aug 2016.

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

  4. Reflecting on the Emergence of the UN Sustainable Development Goals: A Call for Action in Scotland

    White, R. M. & East, M., May 2016, Learning for Sustainability Scotland. 55 p.

    Research output: Book/ReportOther report

Related by journal

  1. Building on common ground to address biodiversity conflicts and foster collaboration in environmental management

    Lecuyer, L., White, R. M., Schmook, B. & Calmé, S., 15 Aug 2018, In : Journal of Environmental Management. 220, p. 217-226 10 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Do we care about sustainability? An analysis of time sensitivity of social preferences under environmental time-persistent effects

    Faccioli, M., Hanley, N., Torres, C. & Font, A. R., 15 Jul 2016, In : Journal of Environmental Management. 177, p. 356-364 9 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 252588240