Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

The development and application of audit criteria for assessing knowledge exchange plans in health research grant applications

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

The development and application of audit criteria for assessing knowledge exchange plans in health research grant applications. / Ruppertsberg, Alexa I.; Ward, Vicky; Ridout, Alicia; Foy, Robbie.

In: Implementation Science, Vol. 9, No. 1, 93, 14.07.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

Ruppertsberg, AI, Ward, V, Ridout, A & Foy, R 2014, 'The development and application of audit criteria for assessing knowledge exchange plans in health research grant applications', Implementation Science, vol. 9, no. 1, 93. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0093-0

APA

Ruppertsberg, A. I., Ward, V., Ridout, A., & Foy, R. (2014). The development and application of audit criteria for assessing knowledge exchange plans in health research grant applications. Implementation Science, 9(1), [93]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0093-0

Vancouver

Ruppertsberg AI, Ward V, Ridout A, Foy R. The development and application of audit criteria for assessing knowledge exchange plans in health research grant applications. Implementation Science. 2014 Jul 14;9(1). 93. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0093-0

Author

Ruppertsberg, Alexa I. ; Ward, Vicky ; Ridout, Alicia ; Foy, Robbie. / The development and application of audit criteria for assessing knowledge exchange plans in health research grant applications. In: Implementation Science. 2014 ; Vol. 9, No. 1.

Bibtex - Download

@article{ebcd228873204d72a4cb78c7505611c1,
title = "The development and application of audit criteria for assessing knowledge exchange plans in health research grant applications",
abstract = "Background: Research funders expect evidence of end user engagement and impact plans in research proposals. Drawing upon existing frameworks, we developed audit criteria to help researchers and their institutions assess the knowledge exchange plans of health research proposals.Findings: Criteria clustered around five themes: problem definition; involvement of research users; public and patient engagement; dissemination and implementation; and planning, management and evaluation of knowledge exchange. We applied these to a sample of grant applications from one research institution in the United Kingdom to demonstrate feasibility. Conclusion: Our criteria may be useful as a tool for researcher self-assessment and for research institutions to assess the quality of knowledge exchange plans and identify areas for systematic improvement.",
keywords = "Impact plans, Knowledge exchange, Research proposals",
author = "Ruppertsberg, {Alexa I.} and Vicky Ward and Alicia Ridout and Robbie Foy",
year = "2014",
month = jul,
day = "14",
doi = "10.1186/s13012-014-0093-0",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Implementation Science",
issn = "1748-5908",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - The development and application of audit criteria for assessing knowledge exchange plans in health research grant applications

AU - Ruppertsberg, Alexa I.

AU - Ward, Vicky

AU - Ridout, Alicia

AU - Foy, Robbie

PY - 2014/7/14

Y1 - 2014/7/14

N2 - Background: Research funders expect evidence of end user engagement and impact plans in research proposals. Drawing upon existing frameworks, we developed audit criteria to help researchers and their institutions assess the knowledge exchange plans of health research proposals.Findings: Criteria clustered around five themes: problem definition; involvement of research users; public and patient engagement; dissemination and implementation; and planning, management and evaluation of knowledge exchange. We applied these to a sample of grant applications from one research institution in the United Kingdom to demonstrate feasibility. Conclusion: Our criteria may be useful as a tool for researcher self-assessment and for research institutions to assess the quality of knowledge exchange plans and identify areas for systematic improvement.

AB - Background: Research funders expect evidence of end user engagement and impact plans in research proposals. Drawing upon existing frameworks, we developed audit criteria to help researchers and their institutions assess the knowledge exchange plans of health research proposals.Findings: Criteria clustered around five themes: problem definition; involvement of research users; public and patient engagement; dissemination and implementation; and planning, management and evaluation of knowledge exchange. We applied these to a sample of grant applications from one research institution in the United Kingdom to demonstrate feasibility. Conclusion: Our criteria may be useful as a tool for researcher self-assessment and for research institutions to assess the quality of knowledge exchange plans and identify areas for systematic improvement.

KW - Impact plans

KW - Knowledge exchange

KW - Research proposals

U2 - 10.1186/s13012-014-0093-0

DO - 10.1186/s13012-014-0093-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 25017548

AN - SCOPUS:84904080190

VL - 9

JO - Implementation Science

JF - Implementation Science

SN - 1748-5908

IS - 1

M1 - 93

ER -

Related by author

  1. Development of REsources based on reasonable adjustments to MAINstream diabetes and obesity care for adults with a learning disability: The REMAIN project

    Russell, A. M., Bryant, L., House, A., Ward, V., Stones, C. & Witty, K., Mar 2019, In : Diabetic Medicine. 36, S1, p. 112-112 1 p., P250.

    Research output: Contribution to journalAbstract

  2. Using frameworks and models to support knowledge mobilization

    Ward, V., 2019, The Role of Knowledge Brokers in Education. Malin, J. & Brown, C. (eds.). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, p. 168-181

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

  3. Knowledge Translation: Key Concepts, Terms and Activities

    Rushmer, R., Ward, V., Nguyen, T. & Kuchenmüller, T., 2019, Population health monitoring: Climbing the information pyramid. Verschuuren, M. & van Oers, H. (eds.). Springer Nature, p. 127-150

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

  4. Creating and implementing local health and wellbeing policy: networks, interactions and collective knowledge creation amongst public sector managers

    Ward, V., Smith, S., Keen, J., West, R. & House, A., Aug 2018, In : Evidence & Policy. 14, 3, p. 477-498 22 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Effectiveness of an intervention for improving drug prescription in primary care patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy: study protocol of a cluster randomized clinical trial (Multi-PAP project)

    Prados-Torres, A., del Cura-González, I., Prados-Torres, D., López-Rodríguez, J. A., Leiva-Fernández, F., Calderón-Larrañaga, A., López-Verde, F., Gimeno-Feliu, L. A., Escortell-Mayor, E., Pico-Soler, V., Sanz-Cuesta, T., Bujalance-Zafra, M. J., Morey-Montalvo, M., Boxó-Cifuentes, J. R., Poblador-Plou, B., Fernández-Arquero, J. M., González-Rubio, F., Ramiro-González, M. D., Coscollar-Santaliestra, C., Martín-Fernández, J. & 7 others, Barnestein-Fonseca, M. P., Valderas-Martínez, J. M., Marengoni, A., Muth, C., Multi-PAP Group, Hernández-Santiago, V. & Azcoaga-Lorenzo, A., 27 Apr 2017, In : Implementation Science. 12, 10 p., 54.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Action to Support Practices Implement Research Evidence (ASPIRE): protocol for a cluster-randomised evaluation of adaptable implementation packages targeting 'high impact' clinical practice recommendations in general practice

    Willis, T. A., Hartley, S., Glidewell, L., Farrin, A. J., Lawton, R., McEachan, R. R. C., Ingleson, E., Heudtlass, P., Collinson, M., Clamp, S., Hunter, C., Ward, V., Hulme, C., Meads, D., Bregantini, D., Carder, P., Foy, R. & ASPIRE programme, 29 Feb 2016, In : Implementation Science. 11, 11 p., 25.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Effectiveness of a strategy that uses educational games to implement clinical practice guidelines among Spanish residents of family and community medicine (e-EDUCAGUIA project): A clinical trial by clusters

    del Cura-González, I., López-Rodríguez, J. A., Sanz-Cuesta, T., Rodríguez-Barrientos, R., Martín-Fernández, J., Ariza-Cardiel, G., Polentinos-Castro, E., Román-Crespo, B., Escortell-Mayor, E., Rico-Blázquez, M., Hernández-Santiago, V., Azcoaga-Lorenzo, A., Ojeda-Ruiz, E., González-González, A. I., Ávila-Tomas, J. F., Barrio-Cortés, J., Molero-García, J. M., Ferrer-Peña, R., Tello-Bernabé, M. E., Trujillo-Martín, M. & 31 others, Barral, A. G., Moreno, A. F., Pérez, P. C., Barba, E. C., Rodríguez Monje, M. T., Iturbe, A. G., Crespo, L. I. M., Mañeru, M. E. M., de Gómez Barragan, M. J. G., Elustondo, S. G., Fuertes, R. R., Cabello Ballesteros, L. M., Nido, R. Á., Moreno, C. B., Rojas, G. C., Rivas, J. L. L., Pikatza, A. Z., Celaya, C. S., Montalvo, M. M., Almeida, L. P. C., álamo Rodríguez, M. D., García-Franco, A. L., Weismann, E. C., álvarez, R. M., Bustillo, B. M., del Pozo, M. S. C., Perruca, L. S., Salinero Fort, M. Á., de Burgos Luna, C., SanJuan, A. M. & Educaguia Group, 17 May 2016, In : Implementation Science. 11, 10 p., 71.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 253148467

Top