Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

The development and validation of a multivariable prognostic model to predict foot ulceration in diabetes using a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analyses

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

DOI

Open Access permissions

Open

Author(s)

F. Crawford, G. Cezard, M. Chappell, The PODUS Group

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Aims: Diabetes guidelines recommend screening for the risk of foot ulceration but vary substantially in the underlying evidence base. Our purpose was to derive and validate a prognostic model of independent risk factors for foot ulceration in diabetes using all available individual patient data from cohort studies conducted worldwide.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of individual patient data from 10 cohort studies of risk factors in the prediction of foot ulceration in diabetes. Predictors were selected for plausibility, availability and low heterogeneity. Logistic regression produced adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for foot ulceration by ulceration history, monofilament insensitivity, any absent pedal pulse, age, sex and diabetes duration.

Results: The 10 studies contained data from 16 385 participants. A history of foot ulceration produced the largest OR [6.59 (95% CI 2.49 to 17.45)], insensitivity to a 10 g monofilament [3.18 (95% CI 2.65 to 3.82)] and any absent pedal pulse [1.97 (95% CI 1.62 to 2.39)] were consistently, independently predictive. Combining three predictors produced sensitivities between 90.0% (95% CI 69.9% to 97.2%) and 95.3% (95% CI 84.5% to 98.7%); the corresponding specificities were between 12.1% (95% CI 8.2% to 17.3%) and 63.9% (95% CI 61.1% to 66.6%).

Conclusions: This prognostic model of only three risk factors, a history of foot ulceration, an inability to feel a 10 g monofilament and the absence of any pedal pulse, compares favourably with more complex approaches to foot risk assessment recommended in clinical diabetes guidelines.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1480-1493
JournalDiabetic Medicine
Volume35
Issue number11
Early online date22 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2018

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of prognostic factors for foot ulceration in people with diabetes: the international research collaboration for the prediction of diabetic foot ulcerations (PODUS)

    Crawford, F., Cezard, G., Chappell, F., Murray, G. D., Price, J., Sheikh, A., Simpson, C., Stansby, G. P. & Young, M. J., Jul 2015, In: Health Technology Assessment. 19, 57, p. 1-210 210 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Complex differences in infection rates between ethnic groups in Scotland: a retrospective, national census-linked cohort study of 1.65 million cases

    Gruer, L. D., Cézard, G. I., Wallace, L. A., Hutchinson, S. J., Douglas, A. F., Buchanan, D., Katikireddi, S. V., Millard, A. D., Goldberg, D. J., Sheikh, A. & Bhopal, R. S., 22 Jan 2021, In: Journal of Public Health.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Risk assessments and structured care interventions for prevention of foot ulceration in diabetes: development and validation of a prognostic model

    Crawford, F., Chappell, F., Lewsey, J., Riley, R., Hawkins, N., Nicolson, D., Heggie, R., Smith, M., Horne, M., Amanna, A., Martin, A., Gupta, S., Gray, K., Weller, D., Brittenden, J. & Leese, G., 25 Nov 2020, In: Health Technology Assessment. 24, 62, p. 1-232 232 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Complication rate among people with diabetes at low risk of foot ulceration in Fife, UK: an analysis of routinely collected data

    Heggie, R., Chappell, F., Crawford, F., Martin, A., Gupta, S., Hawkins, N., Horne, M., Leese, G. P. & Lewsey, J., 13 Nov 2020, In: Diabetic Medicine. 37, 12, p. 2116-2123 8 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. Trends in diabetic retinopathy screening attendance and associations with vision impairment attributable to diabetes in a large nationwide cohort

    Lawrenson, J. G., Bourmpaki, E., Bunce, C., Stratton, I. M., Gardner, P., Anderson, J. & EROS Study Group, Apr 2021, In: Diabetic Medicine. 38, 4, 11 p., e14425.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Complication rate among people with diabetes at low risk of foot ulceration in Fife, UK: an analysis of routinely collected data

    Heggie, R., Chappell, F., Crawford, F., Martin, A., Gupta, S., Hawkins, N., Horne, M., Leese, G. P. & Lewsey, J., 13 Nov 2020, In: Diabetic Medicine. 37, 12, p. 2116-2123 8 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Diabetes incidence in a high-risk UK population at 7 years: linkage of the Prevention of Diabetes and Obesity in South Asians (PODOSA) trial to the Scottish Diabetes Register

    Bhopal, R., Douglas, A., Cezard, G., Gill, J. M. R., Lean, M. E. J., McKnight, J., Sattar, N., Tuomilehto, J., Wallia, S., Sheikh, A. & Wild, S. H., 19 Sep 2020, In: Diabetic Medicine. Early View, e14369.

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

  4. Development of REsources based on reasonable adjustments to MAINstream diabetes and obesity care for adults with a learning disability: The REMAIN project

    Russell, A. M., Bryant, L., House, A., Ward, V., Stones, C. & Witty, K., Mar 2019, In: Diabetic Medicine. 36, S1, p. 112-112 1 p., P250.

    Research output: Contribution to journalAbstractpeer-review

  5. Barriers to and enablers of diabetic retinopathy screening attendance: a systematic review of published and grey literature

    Graham-Rowe, E., Lorencatto, F., Lawrenson, J. G., Burr, J. M., Grimshaw, J. M., Ivers, N. M., Presseau, J., Vale, L., Peto, T., Bunce, C. & Francis, J. J., Oct 2018, In: Diabetic Medicine. 35, 10, p. 1308-1319

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

ID: 263136329

Top