Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

The geometric mean of relative abundance indices: a biodiversity measure with a difference

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

DOI

Open Access permissions

Open

Abstract

The 2010 Biodiversity Target of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), set in 2002, which stated that there should be ‘a significant reduction of the current rate of biodiversity loss' by 2010, highlighted the need for informative and tractable metrics that can be used to evaluate change in biological diversity. While the subsequent Aichi 2020 targets are more wide-ranging, they also seek to reduce the rate of biodiversity loss. The geometric mean of relative abundance indices, G, is increasingly being used to examine trends in biological diversity and to assess whether biodiversity targets are being met. Here, we explore the mathematical and statistical properties of G that make it useful for judging temporal change in biological diversity, and we discuss its advantages and limitations relative to other measures. We demonstrate that the index reflects trends in both abundance and evenness, and that it is not prone to bias when detectability of individuals varies by species. We note that it allows data from different surveys to be combined to generate a composite index. However, the index exhibits high variance and unstable behaviour when rarely-recorded species are included in the analyses.


Read More: http://www.esajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1890/ES11-00186.1
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article number100
Number of pages15
JournalEcosphere
Volume2
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 2 Sep 2011

    Research areas

  • Biodiversity measure, Evenness, Geometric mean, Relative abundance, 2010 Biodiversity Target, 2020 Aichi Biodiversity Targets

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Fine-tuning the assessment of large-scale temporal trends in biodiversity using the example of British breeding birds

    Studeny, A. C., Buckland, S. T., Harrison, P., Illian, J. B., Magurran, A. & Newson, S. E. Feb 2013 In : Journal of Applied Ecology. 50, 1, p. 190-198 9 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Point process models for spatio-temporal distance sampling data from a large-scale survey of blue whales

    Yuan, Y., Bachl, F. E., Lindgren, F., Borchers, D. L., Illian, J. B., Buckland, S. T., Rue, H. & Gerrodette, T. Dec 2017 In : Annals of Applied Statistics. 11, 4, p. 2270-2297

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Quantifying temporal change in biodiversity: challenges and opportunities

    Dornelas, M., Magurran, A., Buckland, S. T., Chao, A., Chazdon, R. L., Colwell, R. K., Curtis, T., Gaston, K. J., Gotelli, N. J., Kosnik, M. A., McGill, B., McCune, J. L., Morlon, H., Mumby, P. J., Øvreås, L., Studeny, A. & Vellend, M. 7 Jan 2013 In : Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 280, 1750, 20121931

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. How should regional biodiversity be monitored?

    Buckland, S. T., Baillie, S., Dick, J., Elston, D., Magurran, A., Scott, M., Smith, R., Somerfield, P., Studeny, A. C. & Watt, A. Dec 2012 In : Environmental and Ecological Statistics. 19, 4, p. 601-626

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. Model selection with overdispersed distance sampling data

    Howe, E. J., Buckland, S. T., Després-Einspenner, M-L. & Kühl, H. S. 20 Sep 2018 In : Methods in Ecology and Evolution. Early View

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. A new approach to estimate fecundity rate from inter-birth intervals

    Arso Civil, M., Cheney, B., Quick, N. J., Thompson, P. M. & Hammond, P. S. Apr 2017 In : Ecosphere. 8, 4, 10 p., e01796

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Individual, ecological, and anthropogenic influences on activity budgets of long-finned pilot whales

    Isojunno, S., Sadykova, D., DeRuiter, S., Curé, C., Visser, F., Thomas, L., Miller, P. J. O. & Harris, C. M. Dec 2017 In : Ecosphere. 8, 12, 26 p., e02044

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Mate limitation in sea lice infesting wild salmon hosts: the influence of parasite sex ratio and aggregation

    Cox, R., Groner, M., Todd, C. D., Gettinby, G., Patanasatienkul, P. & Revie, C. Dec 2017 In : Ecosphere. 8, 12, 19 p., e02040

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Responses of bottlenose dolphins and harbor porpoises to impact and vibration piling noise during harbor construction

    Graham, I., Pirotta, E., Merchant, N., Farcas, A., Barton, T., Cheney, B., Hastie, G. D. & Thompson, P. May 2017 In : Ecosphere. 8, 5, 16 p., e01793

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. Circumpolar habitat use in the southern elephant seal: implications for foraging success and population trajectories

    Hindell, M. A., McMahon, C. R., Bester, M. N., Boehme, L., Costa, D., Fedak, M., Guinet, C., Herraiz-Borreguero, L., Harcourt, R. G., Huckstadt, L., Kovacs, K. M., Lydersen, C., McInytre, T., Muelbert, M., Roquet, F., Williams, G. & Charrassin, J-B. 26 May 2016 In : Ecosphere. 7, 5, p. 1-27 27 p., e01213

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Ecosphere (Journal)

    Smout, S. C. (Reviewer)
    24 May 2018

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial workPeer review of manuscripts

ID: 13665977