Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

The impact of detoxification costs and predation risk on foraging: implications for mimicry dynamics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Christina G. Halpin, John Skelhorn, Candy Rowe, Graeme D. Ruxton, Andrew D. Higginson

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Prey often evolve defences to deter predators, such as noxious chemicals including toxins. Toxic species often advertise their defence to potential predators by distinctive sensory signals. Predators learn to associate toxicity with the signals of these so-called aposematic prey, and may avoid them in future. In turn, this selects for mildly toxic prey to mimic the appearance of more toxic prey. Empirical evidence shows that mimicry could be either beneficial (‘Mullerian’) or detrimental (‘quasi-Batesian’) to the highly toxic prey, but the factors determining which are unknown. Here, we use state-dependent models to explore how tri-trophic interactions could influence the evolution of prey defences. We consider how predation risk affects predators’ optimal foraging strategies on aposematic prey, and explore the resultant impact this has on mimicry dynamics between unequally defended species. In addition, we also investigate how the potential energetic cost of metabolising a toxin can alter the benefits to eating toxic prey and thus impact on predators’ foraging decisions. Our model predicts that both how predators perceive their own predation risk, and the cost of detoxification, can have significant, sometimes counterintuitive, effects on the foraging decisions of predators. For example, in some conditions predators should: (i) avoid prey they know to be undefended, (ii) eat more mildly toxic prey as detoxification costs increase, (iii) increase their intake of highly toxic prey as the abundance of undefended prey increases. These effects mean that the relationship between a mimic and its model can qualitatively depend on the density of alternative prey and the cost of metabolising toxins. In addition, these effects are mediated by the predators’ own predation risk, which demonstrates that, higher trophic levels than previously considered can have fundamental impacts on interactions among aposematic prey species.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0169043
Number of pages18
JournalPLoS One
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jan 2017

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. A theory for investment across defences triggered at different stages of a predator-prey encounter

    Wang, L., Ruxton, G. D., Cornell, S. J., Speed, M. P. & Broom, M., 17 Apr 2019, In : Journal of Theoretical Biology. 473, p. 9-19 11 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Secondary dispersal mechanisms of winged seeds: a review

    der Weduwen, D. & Ruxton, G. D., 19 Jun 2019, In : Biological Reviews. Early View, 9 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

  3. Circular statistics meets practical limitations: a simulation-based Rao’s spacing test for non-continuous data

    Landler, L., Ruxton, G. D. & Malkemper, E. P., 10 May 2019, In : Movement Ecology. 7, 5 p., 15.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Dropping to escape: a review of an under-appreciated antipredator defence

    Humphreys, R. K. & Ruxton, G. D., Apr 2019, In : Biological Reviews. 94, 2, p. 575-589

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Related by journal

  1. PLoS ONE (Journal)

    Joanna Louise Kershaw (Member of editorial board)
    18 Mar 2019

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesPeer review of manuscripts

  2. PLoS ONE (Journal)

    Catharine Penelope Cross (Member of editorial board)
    1 Sep 2018 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

  3. PLoS ONE (Journal)

    Will Cresswell (Reviewer)
    23 May 2018

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesPeer review of manuscripts

  4. PLoS ONE (Journal)

    Barbara Dritschel (Member of editorial board)
    May 2018 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

  5. PLoS ONE (Journal)

    Simon Young (Reviewer)
    7 Jun 201719 Jun 2017

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesPeer review of manuscripts

Related by journal

  1. Agreement between primary care and hospital diagnosis of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: a cross-sectional, observational study using record linkage

    O’Neill, B., Kalia, S., Aliarzadeh, B., Moineddin, R., Fung, W. L. A., Sullivan, F., Maloul, A., Bernard, S. & Greiver, M., 7 Jan 2019, In : PLoS ONE. 14, 1, 15 p., e0210214.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Animal behaviour in a human world: a crowdsourcing study on horses that open door and gate mechanisms

    Krueger, K., Esch, L. & Byrne, R., 26 Jun 2019, In : PLoS ONE. 14, 6, 20 p., e0218954.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Correlates of social role and conflict severity in wild vervet monkey agonistic screams

    Mercier, S., Déaux, E. C., van de Waal, E., Bono, A. E. J. & Zuberbuhler, K., 1 May 2019, In : PLoS One. 14, 5, 20 p., e0214640.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Molecular epidemiology and expression of capsular polysaccharides in Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates in the United States

    Mohamed, N., Timofeyeva, Y., Jamrozy, D., Rojas, E., Hao, L., Silmon de Monerri, N. C., Hawkins, J., Singh, G., Cai, B., Liberator, P., Sebastian, S., Donald, R. G. K., Scully, I. L., Jones, C. H., Creech, C. B., Thomsen, I., Parkhill, J., Peacock, S. J., Jansen, K. U., Holden, M. T. G. & 1 othersAnderson, A. S., 14 Jan 2019, In : PLoS ONE. 14, 1, 33 p., e0208356.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. Orangutans (Pongo abelii) make flexible decisions relative to reward quality and tool functionality in a multi-dimensional tool-use task

    Laumer, I. B., Auersperg, A. M. I., Bugnyar, T. & Call, J., 13 Feb 2019, In : PLoS ONE. 14, 2, 13 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 249000909