Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

The kin-facilitation hypothesis for red grouse population cycles: Territory sharing between relatives

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Jason Matthiopoulos, R Moss, X Lambin

School/Research organisations

Abstract

The regulatory effects of spacing behaviour on population size are the basis of the kin-facilitation hypothesis for population cycles in red grouse. The process of territory sharing, between neighbouring relatives aggregated in kin clusters, is one of the mechanisms postulated to affect spacing behaviour and, through it, population density. We assume perfect philopatry and maximal cooperation, and suppose that the degree of contact between relatives and their ability to recognize kin are the only important factors deciding the amount of territory sharing. These two components are independently quantified as functions of kin cluster size. The resulting relationships are combined to produce a response function describing the effects of cluster size on minimum territory size, and hence carrying capacity. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)53-63
Number of pages11
JournalEcological Modelling
Volume127
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2000

    Research areas

  • aggressive behaviour, behavioural model, carrying capacity, kinship, Lagopus lagopus scoticus, population cycles, red grouse, territoriality, RECOGNITION, MECHANISMS, STABILITY, DENSITY, MODELS, SIZE

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by journal

  1. Ecological Modelling (Journal)

    Monique Lea MacKenzie (Editor)
    2002 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

Related by journal

  1. Integrated modelling of Atlantic mackerel distribution patterns and movements: a template for dynamic impact assessments

    Heinänen, S., Chudzinska, M. E., Brandi Mortensen, J., Teo, T. Z. E., Rong Utne, K., Doksæter Sivle, L. & Thomsen, F., 10 Nov 2018, In : Ecological Modelling. 387, p. 118-133 16 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Pesticides and bees: ecological-economic modelling of bee populations on farmland

    Kleczkowski, A., Ellis, C., Hanley, N. & Goulson, D., 24 Sep 2017, In : Ecological Modelling. 360, p. 53-62 10 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. The effects of invasive pests and pathogens on strategies for forest diversification

    Macpherson, M. F., Kleczkowski, A., Healey, J. R., Quine, C. P. & Hanley, N., 24 Apr 2017, In : Ecological Modelling. 350, p. 87-99 13 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Discriminating between possible foraging decisions using pattern-oriented modelling: the case of pink-footed geese in Mid-Norway during their spring migration

    Chudzińska, M., Ayllón, D., Madsen, J. & Nabe-Nielsen, J., 24 Jan 2016, In : Ecological Modelling. 320, p. 299-315 17 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  5. Dynamics of larch bud moth populations: application of Moran - Ricker models with time lag

    Nedorezov, L. V. & Sadykova, D. L., 10 Feb 2015, In : Ecological Modelling. 297, p. 26-32 7 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 340567

Top