Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

The –ography of markets (or, the responsibilities of market studies)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

The –ography of markets (or, the responsibilities of market studies). / Roscoe, Philip John; Loza, Olga.

In: Journal of Cultural Economy, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2019, p. 215-227.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Roscoe, PJ & Loza, O 2019, 'The –ography of markets (or, the responsibilities of market studies)', Journal of Cultural Economy, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 215-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2018.1557730

APA

Roscoe, P. J., & Loza, O. (2019). The –ography of markets (or, the responsibilities of market studies). Journal of Cultural Economy, 12(3), 215-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2018.1557730

Vancouver

Roscoe PJ, Loza O. The –ography of markets (or, the responsibilities of market studies). Journal of Cultural Economy. 2019;12(3):215-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2018.1557730

Author

Roscoe, Philip John ; Loza, Olga. / The –ography of markets (or, the responsibilities of market studies). In: Journal of Cultural Economy. 2019 ; Vol. 12, No. 3. pp. 215-227.

Bibtex - Download

@article{a27816490f5a4ee78f60a8aae635beec,
title = "The –ography of markets (or, the responsibilities of market studies)",
abstract = "How should we write about markets? What responsibilities does this writing bring upon us? This paper offers an immanent critique of {\textquoteleft}market studies{\textquoteright} scholarship, and through this a call to reflection and reformed action. Turning the intellectual framework of market studies upon itself, we come to see its texts as performative and agential. We discuss these qualities and the associated responsibilities via a reading of literature from the domain of ethnography. An auto-ethnographic sketch of market writing allows us to consider the problematic nature of expertise for market studies scholars and the agency and power of our texts. We find a dual moment of performativity from which our texts emerge more powerful than their authors. On this basis we offer a vision of critical interventions embedded in our texts, underpinned by the intellectual axioms of the market studies program. ",
keywords = "Market studies, Ethnography, Critical perspectives, Performativity tests, Texts, Power relations",
author = "Roscoe, {Philip John} and Olga Loza",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/17530350.2018.1557730",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "215--227",
journal = "Journal of Cultural Economy",
issn = "1753-0350",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
number = "3",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - The –ography of markets (or, the responsibilities of market studies)

AU - Roscoe, Philip John

AU - Loza, Olga

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - How should we write about markets? What responsibilities does this writing bring upon us? This paper offers an immanent critique of ‘market studies’ scholarship, and through this a call to reflection and reformed action. Turning the intellectual framework of market studies upon itself, we come to see its texts as performative and agential. We discuss these qualities and the associated responsibilities via a reading of literature from the domain of ethnography. An auto-ethnographic sketch of market writing allows us to consider the problematic nature of expertise for market studies scholars and the agency and power of our texts. We find a dual moment of performativity from which our texts emerge more powerful than their authors. On this basis we offer a vision of critical interventions embedded in our texts, underpinned by the intellectual axioms of the market studies program.

AB - How should we write about markets? What responsibilities does this writing bring upon us? This paper offers an immanent critique of ‘market studies’ scholarship, and through this a call to reflection and reformed action. Turning the intellectual framework of market studies upon itself, we come to see its texts as performative and agential. We discuss these qualities and the associated responsibilities via a reading of literature from the domain of ethnography. An auto-ethnographic sketch of market writing allows us to consider the problematic nature of expertise for market studies scholars and the agency and power of our texts. We find a dual moment of performativity from which our texts emerge more powerful than their authors. On this basis we offer a vision of critical interventions embedded in our texts, underpinned by the intellectual axioms of the market studies program.

KW - Market studies

KW - Ethnography

KW - Critical perspectives

KW - Performativity tests

KW - Texts

KW - Power relations

U2 - 10.1080/17530350.2018.1557730

DO - 10.1080/17530350.2018.1557730

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 215

EP - 227

JO - Journal of Cultural Economy

JF - Journal of Cultural Economy

SN - 1753-0350

IS - 3

ER -

Related by author

  1. How ‘matter matters’ for morality: the case of a stock exchange

    Roscoe, P., 26 Oct 2020, In: Human Relations. OnlineFirst, p. 1-27 27 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. How the shadow of slavery still hangs over global finance

    Roscoe, P. J., 21 Aug 2020, The Conversation.

    Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

  3. Who can start a stock exchange? Silent legitimacy, mundane materiality and the genesis of markets

    Roscoe, P. J. & Mason, K., 1 Aug 2020, Proceedings of the Eightieth Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management. Antic, G. (ed.). 1 ed. Vol. 2020.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

  4. The dark side of Responsible Management Education: an ontological misstep?

    Roscoe, P. J., Aug 2020, The SAGE handbook of responsible management learning and education. Moosmayer, D. C., Laasch, O., Parkes, C. & Brown, K. G. (eds.). Sage, p. 347-362

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

  5. Performing a myth to make a market: The construction of the ‘magical world’ of Santa

    Palo, T., Mason, K. & Roscoe, P. J., 1 Jan 2020, In: Organization Studies. 41, 1, p. 53-75 23 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. Journal of Cultural Economy (Journal)

    William Vlcek (Reviewer)

    Apr 2019

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesPeer review of manuscripts

  2. Journal of Cultural Economy (Journal)

    Philip John Roscoe (Editor)

    2019 → …

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work typesEditor of research journal

Related by journal

  1. Algorithmic life: calculative devices in the age of big data

    Roscoe, P., 2016, In: Journal of Cultural Economy. 9, 6, p. 631-634 4 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article review

  2. Unsettling issues: valuing public goods and the production of matters of concern

    Roscoe, P. J. & Townley, B., 2016, In: Journal of Cultural Economy. 9, 2, p. 121-126

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Economizing habitus: material calculation and ‘the rules of the game’ in the publishing industry

    Gulledge, E. A., Roscoe, P. J. & Townley, B., 2015, In: Journal of Cultural Economy. 8, 6, p. 637-654

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. The possibility of critique: New Spirits of Capitalism

    Roscoe, P. J., 2014, In: Journal of Cultural Economy.

    Research output: Contribution to journalBook/Film/Article reviewpeer-review

ID: 256820773

Top