Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

The Royal Society and the prehistory of peer review, 1665-1965

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Noah Moxham, Aileen Fyfe

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Despite being coined only in the early 1970s, ‘peer review’ has become a powerful rhetorical concept in modern academic discourse, tasked with ensuring the reliability and reputation of scholarly research. Its origins have commonly been dated to the foundation of the Philosophical Transactions in 1665, or to early learned societies more generally, with little consideration of the intervening historical development. It is clear from our analysis of the Royal Society's editorial practices from the seventeenth to the twentieth centuries that the function of refereeing, and the social and intellectual meaning associated with scholarly publication, has historically been quite different from the function and meaning now associated with peer review. Refereeing emerged as part of the social practices associated with arranging the meetings and publications of gentlemanly learned societies in the late eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Such societies had particular needs for processes that, at various times, could create collective editorial responsibility, protect institutional finances, and guard the award of prestige. The mismatch between that context and the world of modern, professional, international science, helps to explain some of the accusations now being levelled against peer review as not being ‘fit for purpose’.
Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
JournalHistorical Journal
VolumeIn press
Early online date16 Nov 2017
DOIs
StateE-pub ahead of print - 16 Nov 2017

    Research areas

  • Peer Review, Scientific journals, Scientific publishing, Royal Society, Research evaluation

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

Related by journal

  1. 'Contests of vital importance': by-elections, the Labour Party, and the reshaping of British radicalism, 1924-1929

    Petrie, M. R. Mar 2017 In : Historical Journal. 60, 1, p. 121-148 28 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. The freedom of the press in James Mill's political thought

    Grint, K. Jun 2017 In : Historical Journal. 60, 2, p. 363-383

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Lord Bolingbroke’s Theory of Party and Opposition

    Skjoensberg, M. S. 2016 In : Historical Journal. 59, 4, p. 947-973

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  4. Imagining India, decolonising l'Inde française, c. 1947-1954

    Yechury, A. Dec 2015 In : Historical Journal. 58, 4, p. 1141-1165

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Related by journal

  1. Historical Journal (Journal)

    Murdoch, S. (Reviewer)
    16 Jul 2011

    Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial workPeer review of manuscripts

ID: 245601993