Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

The use of Global Positioning Systems to record distances in a helicopter line-transect survey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author(s)

Tiago A. Marques, Magnus Andersen, Signe Christensen-Dalsgaard, Stanislav Belikov, Andrei Boltunov, Oystein Wiig, Stephen T. Buckland, Jon Aars

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Methods that allow unbiased estimation of animal abundance are increasingly demanded in management and conservation. The use of these methods should respect their assumptions. The need for accurate distance measurements in distance-sampling surveys is stressed. Here we present 2 alternative methods for measuring distance from a line to an object during helicopter surveys: 1) using a Global Positioning System (GPS) unit, with distances measured using appropriate software; and 2) recording declination angles and altitudes, using basic trigonometry to obtain the appropriate distances. These are compared to distances measured by a laser rangefinder (assumed to be true distances). The effect of the different errors on estimated densities is assessed by simulation. The GPS method appeared to be very accurate, while a potential downward bias in estimated density could be present if the inclinometer method is used. We discuss the implication for wildlife studies of using different measurement methods leading to different errors.

Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)759-763
Number of pages5
JournalWildlife Society Bulletin
Volume34
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2006

    Research areas

  • bias, distance sampling, Global Positioning System, GPS, helicopter survey, inclinometer, line transects, measuring distances, simulation, SEA

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Corrigendum: The number and distribution of polar bears in the western Barents Sea

    Aars, J., Marques, T. A., Lone, K., Andersen, M., Wiig, Ø., Fløystad, I. M. B., Hagen, S. B. & Buckland, S. T., 22 May 2018, In : Polar Research. 37, 1, 1457880.

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

  2. The number and distribution of polar bears in the western Barents Sea

    Aars, J., Marques, T. A., Lone, K., Andersen, M., Wiig, Ø., Fløystad, I. M. B., Hagen, S. B. & Buckland, S. T., 9 Oct 2017, In : Polar Research. 36, 15 p., 1374125.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  3. Model-based approaches to deal with detectability: a comment on Hutto (2016a)

    Marques, T. A., Thomas, L., Kery, M., Buckland, S. T., Borchers, D. L., Rexstad, E., Fewster, R. M., Mackenzie, D. I., Royle, J. A., Guillera-Arroita, G., Handel, C. M., Pavlacky, D. C. & Camp, R. J., Jul 2017, In : Ecological Applications. 27, 5, p. 1694-1698 5 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

  4. Distance sampling: methods and applications

    Buckland, S. T., Rexstad, E., Marques, T. A. & Oedekoven, C. S., 2015, Cham: Springer. 292 p. (Methods in statistical ecology)

    Research output: Book/ReportBook

  5. Distance Sampling

    Marques, T. A., Buckland, S. T., Borchers, D. L., Rexstad, E. & Thomas, L., 1 Dec 2014, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science. Lovric, M. (ed.). Springer, p. 398 400 p.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Related by journal

  1. Estimating Key Largo woodrat abundance using spatially explicit capture–recapture and trapping point transects

    Potts, J. M., Buckland, S. T., Thomas, L. & Savage, A., Jun 2016, In : Wildlife Society Bulletin. 40, 2, p. 331-338

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  2. Evaluation of wolf density estimation from radiotelemetry data

    Burch, J. W., Adams, L. G., Follmann, E. H. & Rexstad, E., 2005, In : Wildlife Society Bulletin. 33, p. 1225-1236 12 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

ID: 665664