Skip to content

Research at St Andrews

Trends in diabetic retinopathy screening attendance and associations with vision impairment attributable to diabetes in a large nationwide cohort

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

DOI

Open Access permissions

Open

Author(s)

J. G. Lawrenson, E. Bourmpaki, C. Bunce, I. M. Stratton, P. Gardner, J. Anderson, EROS Study Group

School/Research organisations

Abstract

Aims: To investigate diabetic retinopathy screening attendance and trends in certified vision impairment caused by diabetic eye disease. Methods: This was a retrospective study of attendance in three urban UK diabetic eye screening programmes in England. A survival analysis was performed to investigate time from diagnosis to first screen by age and sex. Logistic regression analysis of factors influencing screening attendance during a 15-month reporting period was conducted, as well as analysis of new vision impairment certifications (Certificate of Vision Impairment) in England and Wales from 2009 to 2019. Results: Of those newly registered in the Routine Digital Screening pathway (n = 97 048), 80% attended screening within the first 12 months and 88% by 36 months. Time from registration to first eye screening was longer for people aged 18–34 years, and 20% were unscreened after 3 years. Delay in first screen was associated with increased risk of referable retinopathy. Although 95% of participants (n = 291 296) attended during the 15-month reporting period, uptake varied considerably. Younger age, social deprivation, ethnicity and duration of diabetes were independent predictors of non-attendance and referable retinopathy. Although the last 10 years has seen an overall reduction in vision impairment certification attributable to diabetic eye disease, the incidence of vision impairment in those aged <35 years was unchanged. Conclusions: Whilst the majority of participants are screened in a timely manner, there is considerable variation in uptake. Young adults, have sub-optimal attendance, and levels of vision impairment in this population have not changed over the last 10 years. There is an urgent need to explore barriers to/enablers of attendance in this group to inform policy initiatives and tailored interventions to address this issue.

Close

Details

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere14425
Number of pages11
JournalDiabetic Medicine
Volume38
Issue number4
Early online date1 Nov 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2021

Discover related content
Find related publications, people, projects and more using interactive charts.

View graph of relations

Related by author

  1. Population screening for glaucoma in UK: current recommendations and future directions

    Hamid, S., Desai, P., Hysi, P., Burr, J. M. & Khawaja, A. P., 3 Aug 2021, In: Eye. First Online, 6 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

  2. Interpretation of change scores for the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25: the minimally important difference

    Burr, J. M., Cooper, D., Ramsay, C. R., Che Hamzah, J. & Azuara-Blanco, A., 18 May 2021, (E-pub ahead of print) In: British Journal of Ophthalmology.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  3. Primary trabeculectomy for advanced glaucoma: pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial (TAGS)

    TAGS Study Group, King, A. J., Hudson, J., Fernie, G., Kernohan, A., Azuara-Blanco, A., Burr, J., Homer, T., Shabaninejad, H., Sparrow, J. M., Garway-Heath, D., Barton, K., Norrie, J., McDonald, A., Vale, L., MacLennan, G. & Kousha, O., 12 May 2021, In: BMJ. 373, 11 p., n1014.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  4. Effect of corneal cross-linking versus standard care on keratoconus progression in young patients: the KERALINK randomized controlled trial

    Keralink Trial Study Group, Larkin, D. F. P., Chowdhury, K., Burr, J. M., Raynor, M., Edwards, M., Tuft, S. J., Bunce, C., Caverly, E. & Doré, C., 21 Apr 2021, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Ophthalmology. In Press, 11 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Related by journal

  1. Complication rate among people with diabetes at low risk of foot ulceration in Fife, UK: an analysis of routinely collected data

    Heggie, R., Chappell, F., Crawford, F., Martin, A., Gupta, S., Hawkins, N., Horne, M., Leese, G. P. & Lewsey, J., 13 Nov 2020, In: Diabetic Medicine. 37, 12, p. 2116-2123 8 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

  2. Diabetes incidence in a high-risk UK population at 7 years: linkage of the Prevention of Diabetes and Obesity in South Asians (PODOSA) trial to the Scottish Diabetes Register

    Bhopal, R., Douglas, A., Cezard, G., Gill, J. M. R., Lean, M. E. J., McKnight, J., Sattar, N., Tuomilehto, J., Wallia, S., Sheikh, A. & Wild, S. H., 19 Sep 2020, (E-pub ahead of print) In: Diabetic Medicine. Early View, e14369.

    Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

  3. Development of REsources based on reasonable adjustments to MAINstream diabetes and obesity care for adults with a learning disability: The REMAIN project

    Russell, A. M., Bryant, L., House, A., Ward, V., Stones, C. & Witty, K., Mar 2019, In: Diabetic Medicine. 36, S1, p. 112-112 1 p., P250.

    Research output: Contribution to journalAbstractpeer-review

  4. The development and validation of a multivariable prognostic model to predict foot ulceration in diabetes using a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analyses

    Crawford, F., Cezard, G., Chappell, M. & The PODUS Group, Nov 2018, In: Diabetic Medicine. 35, 11, p. 1480-1493

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

ID: 272129011

Top